search for: 200us

In order to avoid high-frequency cpu migration, vcpus may in fact be scheduled slightly out-of-order. Account for this situation properly. Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> credit2: Fix erronous ASSERT In order to avoid high-frequency cpu migration, vcpus may in fact be scheduled slightly out-of-order. Account for this situation properly. v2: - Update comment

I need another fxo line. Has anyone had any experience with connecting the gsm488 into asterisk? Thanks, Jim.

Hi all, I am interested in interfacing a GSM modem to *. I've seen a few comments about doing this, but I'm not clear whether people have actually made it work. I've used GSM modems for various data jobs, mostly high volume SMS (no, not nasty marketing stuff - high volume solicited SMS :-) ) . These only have analogue ports for voice. Does anyone know of units with digital voice

...64 time=0.039 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.241.44: icmp_seq=125 ttl=64 time=0.195 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.241.44: icmp_seq=126 ttl=64 time=0.263 ms 64 bytes from 10.10.241.44: icmp_seq=127 ttl=64 time=0.210 ms As you can see, the response time before the migration is around 40us, and after, it''s 200us, which is understandable since the VM is now in another physical host. The problem is the 25 lost packets between the last phase of the migration. Don''t get me wrong: 2.5s is a very good time, but 50 times higher than what it is told to be, isn''t. I tried the same test connectin...