search for: 200tb

My samba server has a 1GB partition on which I have a bunch of symlinks to the correct storage via NFS - there are completely valid reasons for this. Unfortunately clients see the share size as 1GB rather than the 200TB cluster that's attached via NFS and thus I can't copy over a 2GB file. Is there anyway to fake the advertised share size on a per share basis (clients can't write to the local partition anyway) - my google foo hasn't led me to the answer. Cheers, Kristian

...d. We have our own tomcat based archiving software that would run on this storage server, along with NFS client and server. Its a write once, read almost never kind of application, storing compressed batches of archive files for a year or two. 400TB written over 2 years translates to about 200TB/year or about 7MB/second average write speed. The very rare and occasional read accesses are done by batches where a client makes a webservice call to get a specific set of files, then they are pushed as a batch to staging storage where the user can then browse them, this can take minutes wit...

Excerpt: Red Hat released the 7.0 version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux today, with embedded support for Docker containers and support for direct use of Microsoft's Active Directory. The update uses XFS as its new file system. --- end excerpt --- <http://www.informationweek.com/cloud/infrastructure-as-a-service/red-hat-enterprise-linux-7-whats-new/d/d-id/1269548> We thought it was still

Hi, i'm having some trouble with freeing space, i have a single node cluster, with a distributed volume of about 200Tb. It's shared trough smb, and mounted via client locally. If i delete from the network, using a windows machine accesing the share, the space shows as free, but when i delete from the linux box, on the mounted volume, the free space is lost. It's something i'm missing about the os, or...

...orth), allowing _some_ ZFS recovery to occur? This makes the robustness of (0), (2) and (4) uncertain to me. Note that this particular pool of storage is intended to be served up to clients via NFS and/or Samba, from a single T2000 file server. We hope to be able to scale this solution up to 100-200TB, by adding arrays or JDBOD''s to the current storage. Suggestions, discussion, advice are welcome. Thanks and regards, Marion