search for: 200mmx

...asic configuration I would start with is the Two Zone setup. I don''t believe that I have any need at this stage for a DMZ. (I would listen to any advice though!) My questions therefore relate to hardware and the firewall arrangement. 1. I have a spare 486-DX2-66, and a spare Pentium-200MMX both with minimum RAM, as well as a couple of small HDD 450 & 850MB. Which of these would be the better to use as the FW, and how does this FW PC impact on the performance of my small network (basically Pentium 111 PC''s). Or are these PC''s inadequate for the task? I can u...

I just wanted to write to you guys and thank you for all of your help and hand-holding as I upgraded our company's file server from a Pentium 200mmx running Novell 4.11 to a nice P4 server running Linux and Samba 3.0.9. It took from September to the end of December to accomplish it, but I have gotten compliments from several users about how smooth the transition was. My environment includes every version of Windows since (and including) Wi...

Ok, got a real interesting bug here (if it is a bug). I have 2 computers running samba, one is an HP, and the other is a Linux machine. The network looks something like this: HP9000 Linux Modem P5-200MMX HP-UX 10.20 <--> Gateway <-- PPP link --> Linux 2.0.29 Stable .16 release .17 release, no patches applied Everything is behind a firewall, so all traffic is "private". There are also a couple of Win95/3.1 boxes hanging around on each network (HP side and Linux side)....

Hi. I have a base 10 hub, a SAMBA 2.2.6 server on a p200mmx, and a win98se box. Everything in DIAGNOSTICS.txt checks out fine, and everything seems to work ok until i try to send an iso image across. That is when smbd crashes (about halfway/300M), and win gives the error 'cannot copy or replace <filename>: the resource or device is no longer ava...

...copy <filename>: the specified network resource is no longer available'. The Samba server then says that the client closed the connection. The server is a Pentium II 350 128M RAM with a SMC etherpower II 10/100 NIC. Running kernel 2.0.36, and epic100 driver v.1.06 The client is a Pentium 200MMX with 64 M RAM with a SMC etherpower II 10/100 NIC Running Windows95 OSR 2. The client is connected to the server by a cross cable. When I try ftp to transfer the 20M file this always goes in under 10 seconds. Around 3 MB (MegaBYtes) per second. When I use Linux and the smbclient on the client mac...

Hi all. I know this has probably been asked before, but I need a quick answer, and didn't find anything on the net. Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of server speed from Win95 clients, accessing files on a Samba 1.9.17p1 server share, as compared to an NT Server, running on the same server hardware? If so, how did Samba 1.9.17 measure up to the NT server? I need an answer to this,