search for: 200mbyte

...works too. > > Then I start Symantecs 'ghost' to create an image from the clients HD and > > put it to the used Samba share on the server. > > The Performance is poooor (<1Mbyte/min), tests with a W2K server on the > same > > hardware showed better values (>200Mbyte/min) :-( . > > What can I do to improve this poor samba throughput??? > > > > Regards > > Ferdi > > > > -- > > +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ > > NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr f?r 1 ct/ Min. surfen! > &...

> For the JIT and a couple of optimizers on x86 (suitably stripped etc), > we see it taking ~2M uncompressed. Additionally, as you say, this is > very compressible for an install image. 2mByte for PC apps is "nothing" these days. The app I have in mind is 50-200mByte depending on install options. To be able to write llvm DLLs and ship intermediate code would definitely be nice. It would take quite a bit more to JIT the entire application as this would be a lot more visible. Perhaps not to the users, but to the developers on the project. One more DLL that ships...

We use some Samba servers running SuSE 7.1 and samba 2.2.1a. These servers are sometimes very slow while delivering data over the network. It is like a short sleep-mode followed by a wake up. We use Win 95, 98 and 98SE Clients. Any ideas? Thanks from germany, Andre Klocke -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed