search for: 200m

...for swap and /. > > Don't clone the partitions. If you do that, then you also need to > randomize the UUIDs on the destination drive. It's probably easier to > just create the partitions on each disk: > > parted -s /dev/sda mklabel gpt \ > mkpart primary ext4 1M 200M \ > mkpart primary ext4 200M 1224M \ > mkpart primary ext4 1224M 100% > parted -s /dev/sdb mklabel gpt \ > mkpart primary ext4 1M 200M \ > mkpart primary ext4 200M 1224M \ > mkpart primary ext4 1224M 100% > > _________________________________________...

×𾴵Ŀͻ§£º ÄúºÃ£¬ÎÒ˾ÊÇרҵÓòÃûÖ÷»úÌṩÉÌ¡£ÓŻݵļ۸ñ¼°¸ßËÙÎȶ¨µÄÖ÷»úÓ®µÃÁ˹ã´ó¿Í»§µÄ¿Ï¶¨¡£ ¹ú¼ÊÓòÃû 80Ôª ¹úÄÚÓòÃû 300Ôª 200M(´¿HTML)Ë͹ú¼ÊÓòÃûÖ»Ðè150Ôª 60M(asp,access)ËÍÓòÃûÓÊÏäÖ»Ðè236Ôª 200M(asp,access)ËÍÓòÃûÓÊÏäÖ»Ðè336Ôª ¸ü¶à......Ïê¼ûhttp://www.ondns.com ³ÏÕ÷È«¹ú´úÀí£¬ÓŻݶà¶à¡£ ÇëÏòQQ£º1761020 MAIL£ºweb@ondns.comË÷È¡´úÀí¼Û¸ñ±í ¡¡¡¡Ë³×£ ÉÌÑw£¡ °ÙæÖдòÈÅÁËÄú£¬Éî¸Ð±§Ç¸¡£Èç²»ÏëÊÕµ½´ËÀàÓʼþ¡£Çë¹ýÂ˾ÜÊÕ´ËÓʼþ£ºdaveddudd...

...isk. Maybe one of the partitions has the wrong size. What's the output of lsblk? [root at nestor:~] # lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 232,9G 0 disk ??sda1 8:1 0 3,9G 0 part ? ??md126 9:126 0 3,9G 0 raid1 [SWAP] ??sda2 8:2 0 200M 0 part ? ??md125 9:125 0 200M 0 raid1 /boot ??sda3 8:3 0 76,4G 0 part ??md127 9:127 0 229G 0 raid5 / sdb 8:16 0 232,9G 0 disk ??sdb1 8:17 0 3,9G 0 part ? ??md126 9:126 0 3,9G 0 raid1 [SWAP] ??sdb2 8:18 0 200M 0 part ? ??md125 9:125 0...

...5G) to 150GB and use free space to add to the existing /(50G). #df -kh Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vg_web-lv_root 50G 7.8G 40G 17% / tmpfs 7.8G 384K 7.8G 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda2 485M 79M 381M 18% /boot /dev/sda1 200M 256K 200M 1% /boot/efi /dev/mapper/vg_web-lv_home755G 6.2G 711G 1% /home Need to have the step, can this be done online or need to go offline (umount) the file systems. Thanks

Hi, I have matrix of sea bottom depths that I am plotting in R with the function 'image'. I am particularly interested in the 200m depth contour (I'm using 'distance from this feature' as a covariate in a model) and would like to extract the data at evenly spaced points along it. I can easily superimpose a line at 200m using the function 'contour'. What I want to know is: can I actually get the data used...

...roblem is that when I run the job interactively (in emacs/ESS), everything works fine. If I try to run it from shell using R CMD BATCH, R will be killed after around 100 000 lines. Solaris says simply "killed" and thats it. The total memory consumption seems not to be a problem, around 200M on a 4G machine. Any suggestions? Has anyone else seen something similar? Best wishes Ott --- this is R 1.7.1, compiled as 32-bit appication, on 64bit sparc solaris 9 (sunos 5.9).

Hello, I am having a serious problem with clients that are connecting to our Mandrake 8.1 server that is using the Samba 2.2.2 RPM. After a few days of having the computers on they will start to take up 200M of ram as reported by top. I don't have this problem with any of the other clients, Win2k, ME, 98 or 95. Is there a setting I need to change on the client side? The only way to release the memory is to reset machine. Logoning off does not release the memory. Any insights or assistance woul...

...-winning Olympic 100m sprint time to be 9.68 seconds (it was actually 9.63 seconds): http://bit.ly/QfChUh" The original by Markus Gesmann can be found at http://lamages.blogspot.pt/2012/07/london-olympics-and-prediction-for-100m.html I've made the same, just changing the address to the 200m historical data, and the predicted time was 19.27. Usain Bolt has just made 19.32. If you want to check it, the address and the 'which' argument are: url <- "http://www.databasesports.com/olympics/sport/sportevent.htm?sp=ATH&enum=120" Plus a change in the graphic funct...

...df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 16G 2.6G 12G 18% / /dev/sda5 883G 35G 803G 5% /state/partition1 /dev/sda2 3.8G 121M 3.5G 4% /var tmpfs 7.7G 0 7.7G 0% /dev/shm /dev/sdb1 917G 200M 871G 1% /gluster none 7.7G 104K 7.7G 1% /var/lib/xenstored glusterfs#/etc/glusterfs/glusterfs.vol 2.7T 600M 2.6T 1% /pifs [root at vm-container-0-0 ~]# mount -a [root at vm-container-0-0 ~]# mount -a [root at vm-container-0-0 ~]# mount -a [root at v...

Hi list, I'm new with UEFI and GPT. For several years I've used MBR partition table. I've installed my system on software raid1 (mdadm) using md0(sda1,sdb1) for swap, md1(sda2, sdb2) for /, md2 (sda3,sdb3) for /home. From several how-to concerning raid1 installation, I must put each partition on a different md devices. I've asked times ago if it's more correct create the

...> sgdisk, create md device for swap and /. Don't clone the partitions. If you do that, then you also need to randomize the UUIDs on the destination drive. It's probably easier to just create the partitions on each disk: parted -s /dev/sda mklabel gpt \ mkpart primary ext4 1M 200M \ mkpart primary ext4 200M 1224M \ mkpart primary ext4 1224M 100% parted -s /dev/sdb mklabel gpt \ mkpart primary ext4 1M 200M \ mkpart primary ext4 200M 1224M \ mkpart primary ext4 1224M 100%

>> What size is recommended for the /boot partition? After doing a fresh >> install and lengthy backup restore I realized I only made it 200M. Is >> this going to be a problem? > > Mine was about 500 MB and I removed some kernels because I got a warning the > partition was getting full. > > With only two kernels installed, 182 MB are used. I would suggest 1 GB and I > believe that is what CentOS 7.3 will do by d...

Trivial fix. We really need a regression test for all v2v inpus related to nbdkit. There is actually nothing at all at the moment. Of course if it was easy to test inputs over the network from a ‘make check’ rule then we'd be doing it already. I thought about adding something like a ‘-it file’ option which would use nbdkit-file-plugin for test only. However I'm rather cautious about

I have a CentOS 6 machine that was initially installed as CentOS 6.4 in May of 2013. It's /boot filesystem is 200M which, IIRC, was the default /boot size at the time. The most recent kernel update (2.6.32-573.18.1.el6) fails because of lack of space in /boot. The workaround is edit /etc/yum.conf, reduce installonly_limit from 5 to something lower (I used 3), remove the oldest kernel via 'rpm -e', and...

Hi, I just replaced Slackware64 14.1 running on my office's HP Proliant Microserver with a fresh installation of CentOS 7. The server has 4 x 250 GB disks. Every disk is configured like this : * 200 MB /dev/sdX1 for /boot * 4 GB /dev/sdX2 for swap * 248 GB /dev/sdX3 for / There are supposed to be no spare devices. /boot and swap are all supposed to be assembled in RAID level 1 across

...On the other hand, when I try to do the same on a PC (128 M RAM, 400MHz), running Linux (Redhat 6.1) , on R version 0.90.0, I find that it is impossible. When I allocate (what I believe to be) the maximum amount of vsize memory and a large amount of nsize memory R --vsize 200M --nsize 4000k, and then try to read the file in using read.table() or scan() myData <- read.table(file = "mydata.dat") or myData <- scan(file = "myData.dat", what = list("",0,0,...,0)) (with 29 zeros) I get kicked out...

...e made to work but we'd have to ban global > variables and modify the load() function. I can (sort of) see it if we support composition; but again, if composition is done right, you still have just a single use of each plugin per nbdkit process. Let's say I want to access [0-100M) and [200M-300M) of a given file via composition. Here's a possible way to write it: nbdkit --filter=compose compose='--filter=offset offset=0 range=100M file file=FILE' --filter=offset offset=200M range=100M file file=FILE Is there a way to rewrite it so I don't have to nest quotes when do...

Experts, I''m installing Oracle 9i on Solaris 10 11/06(update 3),I created some zfs volumes which will be used by oracle data file,as: # zfs create -V 200m ora_pool/controlfile01_200m # zfs create -V 800m ora_pool/system_800m ... # ls -l /dev/zvol/rdsk/ora_pool lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Apr 11 12:23 controlfile01_200m -> ../../../../devices/pseudo/zfs at 0:1c,raw lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Apr 11 13:34 system_800m -&gt...

What size is recommended for the /boot partition? After doing a fresh install and lengthy backup restore I realized I only made it 200M. Is this going to be a problem?

> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:54 PM Simon Matter via CentOS > <centos at centos.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > What makes you think this has *anything* to do with systemd? Bitching >> > about systemd every time you hit a problem isn't helpful. Don't. >> >> If it's not systemd, who else does it? Can you elaborate, please? >> >