Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "200ish".
Did you mean:
300ish
2003 Sep 25
1
Diamond graphs, again.
...so that I could see what was really going on.
4. The paper compares a diamond graph (figure 5) with a trellis graph,
or rather, a pair of trellis graphs (figure 6) for the same data.
I felt much more comfortable with the trellis graph, largely because
the numbers (in the range 0..200ish) were well spread out. The
trellis graph was, however, much bigger, and is less immediately
accessible; the diamond graph conveys an impression of understanding
without needing a lot of explanation.
5. My analysis of perceptual issues was right in some respects and wrong
in other...
2015 Sep 03
4
samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone... already exists
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:18:21 +0100
Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/09/15 15:57, Jim Seymour wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 15:07:37 +0100
> > Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> The kerberos default_realm must be the samba AD DC domain name and
> >> usually
> > So if
2012 Jan 22
2
Best practices?
Suppose I start building nodes with (say) 24 drives each in them.
Would the standard/recommended approach be to make each drive its own
filesystem, and export 24 separate bricks, server1:/data1 ..
server1:/data24 ? Making a distributed replicated volume between this and
another server would then have to list all 48 drives individually.
At the other extreme, I could put all 24 drives into some