Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "20041022".
Did you mean:
20041020
2004 Oct 22
2
direct access or local IMAP access?
...someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.
.O.
..O
OOO
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041022/93e1328b/attachment-0001.bin>
2004 Oct 22
1
[PATCH] support OEM encoding in NTLM messages
...r = "client doesn't advertise NTLM support";
return 0;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041022/457a9af5/attachment-0001.bin>
2004 Oct 22
0
xinerama support
...ken into account in wine? When I open an app in my recently
configured 2 display workstations the windos spans both displays.
Is there a solution for this?
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20041022/d653b271/attachment.html
2004 Oct 21
1
Folders with . in them
Hey guys,
When I create a IMAP folder called "php.net" in Thunderbird, a folder
called "php" is created with a subfolder called "net", is this a bug in
Thunderbird or is it something that I or you can fix?
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc:
2004 Oct 22
1
[PATCH] off-by-one in asprintf/vasprintf
...return -1;
--
Thayne Harbaugh
Linux Networx
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20041022/74f45458/attachment.bin
2004 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
>
> In an effort to start making our makefile system better, I've committed changes
> to Makefile.rules and a few library Makefiles that nearly double the speed of
> our compilations. I can now build all of LLVM (lib, utils, tools, runtime,
> examples) in just over 17 minutes on my system. This used to take over 30
Nice!!
> *
2004 Oct 22
6
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
Hello,
I've closed PR106 (use automake) as WONTFIX. I've already delineated the
problems with automake in previous posts but as of now, all the automake
related stuff has been removed from the repository.
In an effort to start making our makefile system better, I've committed changes
to Makefile.rules and a few library Makefiles that nearly double the speed of
our compilations. I
2004 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
Hi Reid, just a quick note while you're doing this, a while ago I ran
into a problem that the standard makefiles weren't building libraries
(like, say, a new pass) correctly on OS X - they were being built as
shared libraries and not bundles, so they couldn't be loaded with
dlopen. The discussion is in the archives if you want more details...
I fixed it locally by doing the following
2004 Oct 22
6
Hardware Recommendations
...PBX over Ethernet so I
shouldn't need additional cards for that. Am I way off base on any of this
or am I going in the right direction?
Thanks,
Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041022/aaab9b12/attachment.htm