search for: 20041022

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "20041022".

Did you mean: 20041020
2004 Oct 22
2
direct access or local IMAP access?
...someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. .O. ..O OOO -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041022/93e1328b/attachment-0001.bin>
2004 Oct 22
1
[PATCH] support OEM encoding in NTLM messages
...r = "client doesn't advertise NTLM support"; return 0; -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20041022/457a9af5/attachment-0001.bin>
2004 Oct 22
0
xinerama support
...ken into account in wine? When I open an app in my recently configured 2 display workstations the windos spans both displays. Is there a solution for this? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20041022/d653b271/attachment.html
2004 Oct 21
1
Folders with . in them
Hey guys, When I create a IMAP folder called "php.net" in Thunderbird, a folder called "php" is created with a subfolder called "net", is this a bug in Thunderbird or is it something that I or you can fix? -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc:
2004 Oct 22
1
[PATCH] off-by-one in asprintf/vasprintf
...return -1; -- Thayne Harbaugh Linux Networx -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20041022/74f45458/attachment.bin
2004 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > In an effort to start making our makefile system better, I've committed changes > to Makefile.rules and a few library Makefiles that nearly double the speed of > our compilations. I can now build all of LLVM (lib, utils, tools, runtime, > examples) in just over 17 minutes on my system. This used to take over 30 Nice!! > *
2004 Oct 22
6
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
Hello, I've closed PR106 (use automake) as WONTFIX. I've already delineated the problems with automake in previous posts but as of now, all the automake related stuff has been removed from the repository. In an effort to start making our makefile system better, I've committed changes to Makefile.rules and a few library Makefiles that nearly double the speed of our compilations. I
2004 Oct 22
0
[LLVMdev] Makefile.rules Changes / automake update (IMPORTANT!)
Hi Reid, just a quick note while you're doing this, a while ago I ran into a problem that the standard makefiles weren't building libraries (like, say, a new pass) correctly on OS X - they were being built as shared libraries and not bundles, so they couldn't be loaded with dlopen. The discussion is in the archives if you want more details... I fixed it locally by doing the following
2004 Oct 22
6
Hardware Recommendations
...PBX over Ethernet so I shouldn't need additional cards for that. Am I way off base on any of this or am I going in the right direction? Thanks, Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20041022/aaab9b12/attachment.htm