search for: 20031116

...ite them out to a single archive rather than to individual bytecode files again. Can this be done in LLVM today? If not, what would it take to implement? Reid. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/747ca79f/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/747ca79...

...smart enough to load only the one module needed? Does the notion of module inside a module even exist? P.S. Bug 114 (-Wold-style-cast) has a patch ready. Reid -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/a27d4af1/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/a27d4af...

> > Is this what you mean? Is there any reason to keep the .bc files distinct > > like a ".a" file, or is it ok for your purposes to link them together into > > a single unit, like a ".so" file? > > Well, the answer depends on whether the individual modules are > separately loadable or not. Suppose the resulting bytecode file gets JIT > loaded

> In other words, I'd like to take a set of bytecode files, optimize them > together even though they don't form a complete program, and then write > out the new (optimized) bytecode files. It would be preferable to write > them out to a single archive rather than to individual bytecode files > again. Can this be done in LLVM today? If not, what would it take to >

Hi I,ve been meaning to write something in praise of wine, and seeing a posting about personal experience of wine is just the excuse I need. the 20031116.tar.gz version, at least for me, is an improvemnt over the previous months version. I am amazed at how well it can run windows programs...well the ones i need. So I think its great and fantastic and hats off to the developers. Nice one....................david

hi, where can I find the namspace patch? I remember there was an email on this list, that if I'd not like to open all sufolder's in mozilla's mailer on startup, but I'd like to start mozilla to open all subfolder I've to apply the namespace patch. now it getting more and more anoying so I'd like to apply, but I can't find it... thanks. -- Levente

Hello, I'm using dovecot 0.99.10.2 on a debian box. Mailstore is maildir. If I list the IMAP hierarchy in mutt (debian, 1.5.4+20031024-1) it shows all my plain mailboxes as having subfolders - while none of them have. I straced mutt and this is the IMAP exchange (a bit reformatted for readability): write(6, "a0001 LSUB \"\" \"%\"\r\n", 19) = 19 read(3, "

Hi, I have a redhat server running courier-imap + squirrelmail webmail. I am migrating to dovecot... the problem is - the existing sub-folders are all disappear from the folder list. What can I do to fix this problem? Thanks, Jerry Chiu

...contact me ASAP John, I have been trying to get hold of you for the last few weeks regarding an order but so far havent had any luck! Regards, Aaron Martin. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031116/53237d94/attachment.htm

...or so. When you have time, I'd like to hear what you're planning in this area as it will directly effect how I build my compiler and VM. Thanks, Reid. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/ab214fee/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/ab214fe...

.... We are really excited about using the platform in our office, and are doing so on a limited basis, but we need this support to move forward. Thanks. Josh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031116/ecf0b163/attachment.htm

Hello. I have a LDAP database with user data. For that I use posixAccout schema. Now I installed Samba 3, and want to use it as a file server ( and wins server for network browsing of course ). after I added samba.schema to my LDAP database, LDAP wont start anymore.. then I saw that Samba needs SID in its schema. My question now is - what number should I enter for SID?? I don't use

I wasn't able to get DIGEST-MD5 authentication working with passwords stored as plaintext until I tweaked password_generate() to make it not use the domain portion of user at domain.com as the realm. Both evolution and kmail send the email address as the username with no realm; when dovecot tries to convert the username to user + realm, the hash is different and so DIGEST-MD5

...cularly difficult to implement either. Reid. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/f02e63aa/attachment.sig>

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > > >>On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 11:17, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> >>>No, it's all or nothing. Once linked, they cannot be seperated (easily). >>>However, especially when using the JIT, there is little overhead for >>>running a gigantic program that only has 1% of the functions

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 11:17, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > No, it's all or nothing. Once linked, they cannot be seperated (easily). > > However, especially when using the JIT, there is little overhead for > > running a gigantic program that only has 1% of the functions in it ever > > executed... > > Perhaps in the

...b correctly. Make sense? > -Chris Reid. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031116/0a5717c1/attachment.sig>

> The point here is that XPL needs to keep track of what a given variable > represents at the source level. If the compiler sees a map that is > initially small it might represent it in LLVM assembly as a vector of > pairs. Later on, it gets optimized into being a hash table. In order to > do that and keep track of things, I need to know that the vector of > pairs is

Gautham Kasinath Software Engineer Arkin Systems Pvt Ltd T. Nagar Chennai Ph. (91) (44) 8216686 Extn 14