search for: 20031109

...ité de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20031109/908a72de/signature-0001.pgp

...> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev _______________________ Reid Spencer President & CTO eXtensible Systems, Inc. rspencer at x10sys.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031109/a8e7c072/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20031109/a8e7c07...

...ité de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20031109/fbff66dd/signature-0001.pgp

Coming back to the issues that I had integrating LLVM with MSSP, will the code in include/Support also be put in the llvm namespace? That will solve many problems and help prevent others. Rahul ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:13:03 -0600 (CST) >From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> >Subject: [LLVMdev] LLVM namespac'ification >To: LLVMdev List

...(nor does it work as a dovecot user). Aredridel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20031109/ea77e5e4/attachment-0001.bin>

I'm copying files from an Compressed NTFS partition to a samba share. The files seem to copy over correctly but the applications that use them say they are corrupt. When I uncompress the files first I don't get corruption. Is this normal behavior?? -Scott

Hi, I've finally gotten my LDAP password backend up and running, and finally figured out the SID 1000/1001 thing for Samba admin. However I'm unable to join the workstation to my domain. Using any random user in the WXP dialogue, I get the "Access is Denied" error. Fair enough. Using the user with sambasid and sambagroupsid s-*-1000/s-*-1001, I get the error "The Username

hi, i'm using suse 7.3 with samba 2.2.8 as PDC and openldap for authentification in network with wfw-, winnt-, w2k-clients. everything works fine. because not every client has the same configuration (same progs, same path's, hardware...), i got problems, if a user dosn't login from his ordinary workstation, his roaming-profile doesn't work fine. now, how can i force users only

I've just found out today that my system won't let users (2000 and XP clients) change their passwords. >From their consoles they get permission denied messages. Looking at the logs its clearly a Samba/PAM interaction issue but all looks OK in the pam.d directory. I've spent a few hours searching online but can't find anything that match's this scenario. Extract from users

Currently running CVS of SAMBA 3.1 - pulled down last night. The Samba machine is joining the domain (or so it reports) but it doesn't show up in AD Users & Computers. Attempting to browse the Samba computer from Windows (Advanced Server 2000) fails with password/username failures. Here is the output from "net ads join -U administrator". Yes, this is showing that I was

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > At this point, if you want to help, the best way would probably to try > tracking done what part of the code is responsible for the high system. > Once this is identified, we'll have a much better idea. > > I managed to log on the XSCALE 400 on handhelds.org. It helped, but I > can't do everything with it (and by attempts at profiling failed). I

Hello, I have this bug report that I have filed. Is there any specific reason why samba behaves this way, and doesn't use the unix semantics? Since this is even more restrictive than unix semantics, I'm more inclined to call it a bug until I know it's supposed to be this way. Any ideas? ----- Forwarded message from Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> ----- From: Mike Fedyk

...ité de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 577 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20031109/571e3031/signature-0001.pgp

...ité de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20031109/077c9fe8/signature-0001.pgp

First, I'd just like to thank the Speex community, and Jean-Marc especially, for their great work. I'm developing a VoIP library (which uses IAX, the asterisk protocol) as the network protocol. I've been putting off integrating Speex for a while, as things have been working pretty well so far with GSM. (for those interested, the code is at iaxclient.sourceforge.net). However,