search for: 20030103

.../openssh_chroot_patch/ Problems/Complaints/Suggestions/Additions can be sent to me at this address. Cheers, nick -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: chroot.patch Url: http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20030103/6ef03ef4/attachment.ksh -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/attachments/20030103/6ef03ef4/attachment.bin

...forge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flac-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: out.bz2 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 6516 bytes Desc: Standard output Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20030103/118594a7/out.obj -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: err.bz2 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2412 bytes Desc: Standard error Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20030103/118594a7/err.obj

...the class and/or data.class of x and y in wilcox.test.default and produce error messages or warnings for inappropriate objects - coerce to numeric unconditionally (probably not a good idea) Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> writes: > Package: r-base > Version: 1.5.0-2 / 1.6.1.cvs.20030103-1 > Severity: normal > > I have some ordinal data and I wanted to perform an u-test. However, > a problem occured: > > > x <- read.table("spss-3.txt", header=TRUE) > > a = factor(x$a) > > b = factor(x$b) > > summary(a) > 1 2 3...

Hi all, I have uploaded a source tarball to sourceforge for testing. See the news item in the HTML docs for the changes (or look here: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/flac/flac/doc/html/news.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html ) Download here: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.5_beta1.tar.gz?download The standard test of 'configure &&

Dear all, Got a problem that turns me around. I'm quite new to samba. Yesterday when i tried the wbinfo -u/-g and other options worked without any worry. Also there was no error in the UNIX passwd program where i even changed the root password. This morning onwards i'm facing with problems where the wbinfo says there is an error looking up the domain for users and groups -h -i works

Good evening, On the bottom of page 53, section 4.1.2.2 in the SNIA spec (http://www.snia.org/tech_activities/CIFS/CIFS-TR-1p00_FINAL.pdf), it states if the dialect is NT LM 0.12 and extended security is off (I.e., use "traditional" NTLMv2/NTLMv2 authentication w/o SecurityBlobs), the SessionSetupAndX response is as shown in section 4.1.2.2 with a word count = 4. However, what I have

...nd y in wilcox.test.default > and produce error messages or warnings for inappropriate objects > - coerce to numeric unconditionally (probably not a good idea) > > Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> writes: > > > Package: r-base > > Version: 1.5.0-2 / 1.6.1.cvs.20030103-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > I have some ordinal data and I wanted to perform an u-test. However, > > a problem occured: > > > > > x <- read.table("spss-3.txt", header=TRUE) > > > a = factor(x$a) > > > b = factor(x$b) > &...

I have tried (RH7.3/shorewall-1.3.12-1) both of the following in shorewall.conf to eliminate ''rfc1918'' logging into /var/log/messages: RFC1918_LOG_LEVEL=debug RFC1918_LOG_LEVEL=notice Neither appear to eliminate the logging. Here''s what the ''logdrop'' chain shows: 1 229 LOG all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 LOG flags 0 level 6 prefix \

Hi sambafolks, I see a number of topics cropping up here repeatedly over the last few weeks: * Files > 4GB not supported This is confirmed and solved in 2.2.7a, but not in the current incarnation of smbfs (which is not part of samba, I know, but will get discussed here as a related topic) * desktop.ini weirdness in profiles I've seen this mentioned a few times with no sign of a

I was recently talking to a friend of mine who produces what's widely referred to as "techno", music that's heavy on electronically generated loops and effects, samples, and has plenty of bass. He doesn't like ogg for a few reasons - he sent me a rather long email, and I've stripped out the nonsense from it (he has some technically irrelevant reasons for not liking