Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "2002ms".
Did you mean:
2000ms
2009 Apr 03
0
[Bridge] Interesting fragmentation behavior with gretap interface.
...bytes of data.
1480 bytes from 192.168.7.175: icmp_seq=1 ttl=250 time=36.9 ms
1480 bytes from 192.168.7.175: icmp_seq=2 ttl=250 time=52.1 ms
1480 bytes from 192.168.7.175: icmp_seq=3 ttl=250 time=44.5 ms
--- 192.168.7.175 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 36.994/44.569/52.160/6.191 ms
Normal as can be... Now untagged:
$ ping -c 3 -M do -s 1472 10.8.1.1
PING 10.8.1.1 (10.8.1.1) 1472(1500) bytes of data.
--- 10.8.1.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1999ms
Same result all the way...
2012 Oct 10
0
Network issue with multiple uplinks
....8) from 100.10.10.1 eth1: 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=16.9 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=19.4 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=20.7 ms
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 16.378/16.796/17.289/0.390 ms
and
# ping -c 3 -I eth2 8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) from 99.10.11.1 eth2: 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=24.9 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=25.3 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl...
2010 Apr 27
3
High network latency on first packet
....4
PING 1.2.3.4 (1.2.3.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 1.2.3.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=304 ms
64 bytes from 1.2.3.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=22.7 ms
64 bytes from 1.2.3.4: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=22.7 ms
^C
--- 1.2.3.4 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 22.702/116.691/304.574/132.853 ms
Immediately replying remote host on second try.
$ ping 1.2.3.4
PING 1.2.3.4 (1.2.3.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 1.2.3.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=23.0 ms
64 bytes from 1.2.3.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=22.8 ms
64 bytes from 1.2.3.4: i...
2015 Aug 28
2
lists.samba.org's Mail Servers Are A Bit Wonky?
....
64 bytes from 144.76.82.148: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=117 ms
64 bytes from 144.76.82.148: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=114 ms
64 bytes from 144.76.82.148: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=113 ms
^C
--- 144.76.82.148 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 113.948/115.229/117.293/1.473 ms
$ ping 162.209.107.11
PING 162.209.107.11 (162.209.107.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 162.209.107.11: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=27.7 ms
64 bytes from 162.209.107.11: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=23.4 ms
64 bytes from 16...
2005 Feb 18
0
Howto? 2 interfaces, same network, same gateway
...234 wlan0: 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.64 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.28 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2.33 ms
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.289/2.757/3.645/0.630 ms
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i8600:~# ping -I wlan0 google.com.au
PING google.com.au (216.239.57.104) from 192.168.0.234 wlan0: 56(84) bytes of
data.
--- google.com.au ping statistics ---
6 packets...
2010 Jan 11
1
matchname messages filling logs - howto stop?
Listmates,
I have had a few boxes where the 'matchname' message is filling my syslog with
one new message ever ~40 seconds or so. No performance problems, just the log
annoyance. An example of the messages are:
Jan 11 13:43:03 nemesis smbd[2246]: [2010/01/11 13:43:03, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:1685(get_peer_name)
Jan 11 13:43:03 nemesis smbd[2246]: Matchname failed on Adrienne-PC.rbpllc.com
2017 Aug 30
4
sshd dies when starting gkrellm
sshd also dies when certain other kinds of traffic is generated, such as
`man pw' using the most pager[1], and many x11 apps such as emacs.
However, it is stable when running simple x11 apps such as xeyes, and
the link its self is stable -- a terminal will stay connected without
issue for days, as long as not much happens in it. Also a sshfs
connection dies immediately.
ssh -Y karren
gkrellm