search for: 2000sp4

Hello everybody. I'm experimenting this problem with samba 3.0.2a and linux 2.4.25 with ReiserFS. When I copy (put) a large file (5GB) from a Windows NT terminal server sp6a to the samba-linux box, the md5sum is different between the two file. Files size are identical. I'm using this command to copy these files from windows to samba: xcopy f:\ \\mimas\backup\exchange /e /c /h /r I have

...i) Date: Thu Apr 15 13:20:19 2004 Subject: [Samba] Fw: md5 fail on large file Message-ID: <Sea2-DAV63HZOzTBoLI000250bc@hotmail.com> Me again. I have upgraded to linux kernel 2.6.5. However this problem hasn't gone away. The md5 check is fine, coping the same file from NT4TSE to a Windoze 2000sp4. Coping the same file from a windoze 2000sp4 to the samba share is ok. So the problem is between NT4TSE and samba. NT4TSE --> SAMBA = KO WIN2k --> SAMBA = OK NT4TSE --> WIN2K = OK Can anybody help me? Marco Berizzi wrote: > Hello everybody. > > I'm experimenting this p...

...(compiled >from source) on linux 2.6.5: same behaviour. > > >Marco Berizzi wrote: > > > Me again. I have upgraded to linux kernel > > 2.6.5. However this problem hasn't gone away. > > The md5 check is fine, coping the same file > > from NT4TSE to a Windoze 2000sp4. > > Coping the same file from a windoze 2000sp4 > > to the samba share is ok. So the problem is > > between NT4TSE and samba. > > > > NT4TSE --> SAMBA = KO > > WIN2k --> SAMBA = OK > > NT4TSE --> WIN2K = OK > > > > Can anybody help me...

It seems like most people here are asking pretty advanced questions, and I don't think this is one--but I've read a lot of documentation and I can't come up with an answer. We have a 100% Windows-based IT infrastructure here, including using AD to manage hostname mapping. I know hardly anything about Windows, since I've been a UNIX person for 20+ years and I've been