search for: 200.000

????? ?????????? ?? 200.000 ?? 300.000 ?????? ? ?????. ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ??????. ?????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????? ??????: http://market716.0catch.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20140502/cb05eebc/attachment.html>

????? ?????????? ?? 200.000 ?? 300.000 ?????? ? ?????. ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ??????. ?????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????? ??????: http://amfomtou.ya.ru -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20140503/5b3fe963/attachment.html>

On 24/8/20 7:12, Fabien KOCIK wrote: > First, extract user list using doveadm users '*'. > Then process this list to fit your needs (seven parts for a week and a > part processed by week day for example). > Finally, use -u option of doveadm purge into a loop. This is a good idea for installations with tons of users. Good point. I would be personally interested in incremental

> > On 24/08/2020 08:30 Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote: > > > > > > I would be personally interested in incremental purge per user. My > > personal IMAP account, for instance, has at this moment about 40GB > > of mdbox files. I keep most of my email for decades, but sure I > > could free some space doing a purge, but I am scared of trying with

Hi, I have converted some mbox mailboxes to maildir. Inbox and folders had been cpopied before into a separate directories "old-home" and old-inbox onto the new server (dovecot 2.0.2. with fix hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/14a6e526900d). dsync -v -u user mirror mbox:/old-homehome/~user:INBOX=/old-inbox/user It works but it lasts "very long" time. For one mailbox with 2,4

Hello Teresa, > Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, That’s correct. > which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. That’s not correct. Even if libexp.a would have __exp_finite, it wouldn’t be resolved from libexp.a, because of the behavior described in my first message. > Do you also have an implementation of __exp_finite in your libexp.a? No, I don’t

Hello, I have a samba server on OpenPower (SUSE SLES9) and a DS4300 storage attached.There is a lot of data (8 TB mp3 files). Some directories contains more then 250.000 files. The application is a music playbox in a huge CD shop: you can take a CD hold it under the scanner and after the barcode is scanned it starts playing the first CD track (for 30 seconds). All files are exactly 125K in size.

> I'm trying to understand how the non-LTO case is supposed to work non-LTO case works because when linker starts it’s job all the llvm intrinsics are already lowered. > Right, which is why I am suggesting that it might be appropriate to build with -fno-builtin (or -fno-builtin-exp) here – > this solves the LTO issue as there will no longer be an llvm intrinsic in the bitcode Yes, I

We're using rsync 2.6.3 to sync two DELL PowerEdge servers with both Redhat-EL4 and otherwise nearly identical hardware (2.8/3GHz, 1GB RAM each). The source machine has a SCSI-RAID1, the destination a SATA-RAID1 disk attached. There are 5 filesystems which are rsynced via ssh. On the smaller filesystems with ~200.000 files/7GB, rsync takes 1-3 minutes: lion:/atg/ ========= Tue Aug 22

Hi, When I run the survfit function, I want to get the restricted mean value and the standard error also. I found out using the "print" function to do so, as shown below, print(km.fit,print.rmean=TRUE) Call: survfit(formula = Surv(diff, status) ~ 1, type = "kaplan-meier") records n.max n.start events *rmean *se(rmean) median 200.000

+pcc for thoughts On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Bakhvalov, Denis <denis.bakhvalov at intel.com > wrote: > Hello Teresa, > > > > > Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, > > That’s correct. > > > > > which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. > > That’s not correct. Even if libexp.a would have __exp_finite, it

Dear community, Recently I discovered that llvm gold linker plugin (LLVMgold.so) doesn't add llvm instrinsics symbols to the linker symbol table. I do not claim that something is necessary wrong, just want to share my observations with the community. Brief summary If I create a static library with a custom version of 'exp()' math function and link it as follows: $

A couple questions/notes so I can understand better: Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. Do you also have an implementation of __exp_finite in your libexp.a? Can you build with -fno-builtin, or -fno-builtin-exp etc? That results in a reference to __exp_finite in the .o bitcode (which of course has the same issue I

Jesus Cea skrev den 2020-08-24 07:30: > I would be personally interested in incremental purge per user. My > personal IMAP account, for instance, has at this moment about 40GB of > mdbox files. I keep most of my email for decades, but sure I could free > some space doing a purge, but I am scared of trying with 200.000 mdbox > files without knowing how long it would take. why not

> On 24/08/2020 08:30 Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote: > > > On 24/8/20 7:12, Fabien KOCIK wrote: > > First, extract user list using doveadm users '*'. > > Then process this list to fit your needs (seven parts for a week and a > > part processed by week day for example). > > Finally, use -u option of doveadm purge into a loop. > > This

Hi, guys: These days I keep using R and Weka to do data mining. I think my next step is open the source codes so that I can "customrize them" and make them better server my purpose. But now I kinda hesitate to do so b/c I am really not sure which is better to start with. You know, both require some time and I cannot clone myself to work on both:) If here are some persons who used both

OFERTAS PARA PYME's: Hospedaje para sitios web, desde $20.000 + iva ANUAL ( 10 mb + 3 emails + Ftp, Panel de Control, Php, MySql // Servidor Linux // Enlace 100 mb/seg ) Desarrollo de sitios web, desde $30.000 + iva ( Plantillas pre-disenadas, con hosting $50.000 ) Dominios .com - .net - .org $15.000 + iva ANUAL Inscripcion en 200.000 motores de busqueda $15.000 + iva

Hello, I implemented two functions reshape_long and reshape_wide (see full working example below) to reshape data frames. I created several small examples and the two functions seemed to work properly. However, using the reshape_wide function on my real data sets (about 200.000 to 300.000 rows) failed. What happens is set all values for X, Y and Z were set to 1. The structure of my real data

I am using mdbox storage format. As far as I know, ?doveadm purge? does a complete purge. The time and disk activity would be proportional to the number mdbox files on the storage. The purge time could be huge. I wonder if there is some way of doing a kind of incremental purge, stopping/restarting purging, etc. Purging by file range would be nice too. Advice? Thanks Enviado desde mi iPhone

Hello, i am interested in developing against the libvirt library. But we would also need an actively developed version for Windows. The links I found on the website for Windows related builds are all pretty outdated and do not really work for me. * https://github.com/SPICE/virt-viewer Last commit 2 years ago * https://github.com/photron/msys_setup Last commit 5 years ago So before