search for: 200.000

????? ?????????? ?? 200.000 ?? 300.000 ?????? ? ?????. ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ??????. ?????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????? ??????: http://market716.0catch.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20140502/cb05eebc/attachment.html>

????? ?????????? ?? 200.000 ?? 300.000 ?????? ? ?????. ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ??????. ?????? ??????????? ?? ????? ????? ??????: http://amfomtou.ya.ru -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.zytor.com/pipermail/klibc/attachments/20140503/5b3fe963/attachment.html>

On 24/8/20 7:12, Fabien KOCIK wrote: > First, extract user list using doveadm users '*'. > Then process this list to fit your needs (seven parts for a week and a > part processed by week day for example). > Finally, use -u option of doveadm purge into a loop. This is a good idea for installations with tons of users. Good point. I would be personally interested in incremental

Hi guys, For my MSc. thesis i am using R studio. The goal is for me to merge a couple (6) of relatively large datasets (min of 200.000 and max of 2mil rows). I have now been able to do so, however I think something might be going wrong in my codes. For reference, i have a dataset 1 (200.000), dataset 2 (600.000), dataset 3 (2mil) and dataset 4 (2mil) merged into one dataset of 4mil, and dataset 5

Some issues: 1) Variable names cannot have spaces. "merged 1" is not valid but "merged_1" is a valid alternative. 2) You need to tell R what to merge by. It looks like you may be using data tables rather than a data frame. merged <- dataset2[dataset1, on = "id", nomatch = NA] 3) Alternatively: join functions from the dplyr package, cbind(), and rbind() can be used

> > On 24/08/2020 08:30 Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote: > > > > > > I would be personally interested in incremental purge per user. My > > personal IMAP account, for instance, has at this moment about 40GB > > of mdbox files. I keep most of my email for decades, but sure I > > could free some space doing a purge, but I am scared of trying with

Hi, I have converted some mbox mailboxes to maildir. Inbox and folders had been cpopied before into a separate directories "old-home" and old-inbox onto the new server (dovecot 2.0.2. with fix hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/14a6e526900d). dsync -v -u user mirror mbox:/old-homehome/~user:INBOX=/old-inbox/user It works but it lasts "very long" time. For one mailbox with 2,4

Hello Teresa, > Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, That’s correct. > which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. That’s not correct. Even if libexp.a would have __exp_finite, it wouldn’t be resolved from libexp.a, because of the behavior described in my first message. > Do you also have an implementation of __exp_finite in your libexp.a? No, I don’t

Hello, I have a samba server on OpenPower (SUSE SLES9) and a DS4300 storage attached.There is a lot of data (8 TB mp3 files). Some directories contains more then 250.000 files. The application is a music playbox in a huge CD shop: you can take a CD hold it under the scanner and after the barcode is scanned it starts playing the first CD track (for 30 seconds). All files are exactly 125K in size.

> I'm trying to understand how the non-LTO case is supposed to work non-LTO case works because when linker starts it’s job all the llvm intrinsics are already lowered. > Right, which is why I am suggesting that it might be appropriate to build with -fno-builtin (or -fno-builtin-exp) here – > this solves the LTO issue as there will no longer be an llvm intrinsic in the bitcode Yes, I

> Variable names cannot have spaces Please soften your words... variables can have all sorts of characters including spaces in them, but it can be inconvenient to quote them all with back-tick quotes like `merged 1` so where possible most people avoid variable names with weird characters. People also often have to work with column names provided by an external source. It can be harder to

We're using rsync 2.6.3 to sync two DELL PowerEdge servers with both Redhat-EL4 and otherwise nearly identical hardware (2.8/3GHz, 1GB RAM each). The source machine has a SCSI-RAID1, the destination a SATA-RAID1 disk attached. There are 5 filesystems which are rsynced via ssh. On the smaller filesystems with ~200.000 files/7GB, rsync takes 1-3 minutes: lion:/atg/ ========= Tue Aug 22

Hi, When I run the survfit function, I want to get the restricted mean value and the standard error also. I found out using the "print" function to do so, as shown below, print(km.fit,print.rmean=TRUE) Call: survfit(formula = Surv(diff, status) ~ 1, type = "kaplan-meier") records n.max n.start events *rmean *se(rmean) median 200.000

+pcc for thoughts On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Bakhvalov, Denis <denis.bakhvalov at intel.com > wrote: > Hello Teresa, > > > > > Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, > > That’s correct. > > > > > which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. > > That’s not correct. Even if libexp.a would have __exp_finite, it

Dear community, Recently I discovered that llvm gold linker plugin (LLVMgold.so) doesn't add llvm instrinsics symbols to the linker symbol table. I do not claim that something is necessary wrong, just want to share my observations with the community. Brief summary If I create a static library with a custom version of 'exp()' math function and link it as follows: $

A couple questions/notes so I can understand better: Without -flto, a.o ends up with a reference to __exp_finite, which also would not be satifisfied out of libexp.a. Do you also have an implementation of __exp_finite in your libexp.a? Can you build with -fno-builtin, or -fno-builtin-exp etc? That results in a reference to __exp_finite in the .o bitcode (which of course has the same issue I

Jesus Cea skrev den 2020-08-24 07:30: > I would be personally interested in incremental purge per user. My > personal IMAP account, for instance, has at this moment about 40GB of > mdbox files. I keep most of my email for decades, but sure I could free > some space doing a purge, but I am scared of trying with 200.000 mdbox > files without knowing how long it would take. why not

> On 24/08/2020 08:30 Jesus Cea <jcea at jcea.es> wrote: > > > On 24/8/20 7:12, Fabien KOCIK wrote: > > First, extract user list using doveadm users '*'. > > Then process this list to fit your needs (seven parts for a week and a > > part processed by week day for example). > > Finally, use -u option of doveadm purge into a loop. > > This

Hi, guys: These days I keep using R and Weka to do data mining. I think my next step is open the source codes so that I can "customrize them" and make them better server my purpose. But now I kinda hesitate to do so b/c I am really not sure which is better to start with. You know, both require some time and I cannot clone myself to work on both:) If here are some persons who used both

OFERTAS PARA PYME's: Hospedaje para sitios web, desde $20.000 + iva ANUAL ( 10 mb + 3 emails + Ftp, Panel de Control, Php, MySql // Servidor Linux // Enlace 100 mb/seg ) Desarrollo de sitios web, desde $30.000 + iva ( Plantillas pre-disenadas, con hosting $50.000 ) Dominios .com - .net - .org $15.000 + iva ANUAL Inscripcion en 200.000 motores de busqueda $15.000 + iva