Displaying 20 results from an estimated 21 matches for "20.58".
Did you mean:
0.58
2001 Dec 13
2
Problem to interpret wilcox.test
I've got two set of data :
22.45 21.56 20.48 19.59 21.52 = A
and
22.15 21.98 20.42 20.58 19.61 = B
I perform a wilcox.test on this two set
wilcox.test(A, B) and I'd this answer:
Wilcoxon rank sum test
data: A and B
W = 12, p-value = 1
alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0
Should I interpret that there is no difference between the two sets ?
--
Cordialement
2011 Dec 28
2
convert variable types when creating data frame from cor.test results
Dear list,
The below dataset and code creates a new dataset with the results from
the function cor.test being performed on each individual
('Individual_ID') from my original dataset. How do I convert each
variable from the cor.test results to a numeric data type, as it is
passed into the new dataframe? For example, 'estimate', 'p.value', and
'conf.int' should be
2007 Aug 21
2
Optimization problem
Hello Folks,
Very new to R so bear with me, running 5.2 on XP. Trying to do a zero-inflated negative binomial regression on placental scar data as dependent. Lactation, location, number of tick larvae present and mass of mouse are independents. Dataframe and attributes below:
Location Lac Scars Lar Mass Lacfac
1 Tullychurry 0 0 15 13.87 0
2 Somerset 0 0 0
2011 Dec 27
2
How to create a loop and then extract values from the list generated by cor.test
Dear all,
I would like to conduct a Pearson's correlation using cor.test
separately for each individual in my data set. Each individual has
nine observations of the measurement variable 'Delta13C'. I can figure
our how to do it manually one 'Individual_ID' at a time, but I cannot
figure out how to automate the process (a loop I am guessing). In
addition, I would like to
2010 Feb 21
1
[LLVMdev] patch: purdy colours for makefiles
Here is a patch to add colour to build output (make) for LLVM sources.
Feedback and ideas welcome.
The patch replaces $(Echo) usage in some key rules in Makefile.rules
with $(Banner) which invokes a new script utils/make-banner.sh which
is capable of adding appropriate ANSI escape sequences.
step1: apply patch
step2: chmod 755 utils/make-banner.sh
step3: export MAKE_BANNER_ANSI=1
Next, you must
2007 Aug 16
2
Newbie
Hello,
I'm a bit new to the world of R so forgive my ignorance. I'm trying to do a zero-inflated negative binomial regression and have received an error message and i'm not sure what it means. I'm running R 2.5.1 on XP. I have just tried a really simple version of the model to see if it would run before I put all the variables in. I have attached all the variables to the
2018 Nov 05
1
error Cached MIME parts don't match message during parsing: Cached header size mismatch (parts=)
Ok, I will try to do this but should I do some backup of INBOX earlier?
2018-11-02 20:21 GMT+01:00 Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi>:
>
>
> On 2 Nov 2018, at 20.58, Poliman - Serwis <serwis at poliman.pl> wrote:
>
> I have a problem for specific mailbox. In mail.err file I see a lot:
>
> Nov 2 07:41:17 s1 dovecot: imap(artur at example.pl): Error:
2020 Jul 14
1
dovecot 2.2.13
all, below command not reporting the actual usage report on dovecot 2.2.13.
please share your suggestion to how to fix this issue
doveadm -f flow mailbox status -A -t 'messages vsize' '*' is just showing
rkreddy messages=0 vsize=0
jcplho messages=0 vsize=0
planning messages=0 vsize=0
accounts messages=0 vsize=0
spam.notify messages=0 vsize=0
jsraju messages=0 vsize=0
amarnath
2010 Oct 04
1
Force index 2.04
Hey, i am gonna migrate 240 GB of emails. To a new server with dovecot 2.0.4
and i am gonna also change the format from mbox to maildir.
Everything is pretty ready.
But i now need two things.
First is, is there any command to rebuild index files in dovecot ?
And i need to force a initial squat build, need comand for it also. It is
about 5 thousands accounts. Its prefere have this built in
2018 Nov 02
2
error Cached MIME parts don't match message during parsing: Cached header size mismatch (parts=)
I have a problem for specific mailbox. In mail.err file I see a lot:
Nov 2 07:41:17 s1 dovecot: imap(artur at example.pl): Error:
unlink(/var/vmail/example.pl/artur/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache)
failed: No such file or directory (in mail-cache.c:28)
Nov 2 07:41:17 s1 dovecot: imap(artur at example.pl): Error: Corrupted
index cache file
/var/vmail/example.pl/artur/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache:
2013 Feb 05
2
Possible sort optimization (?)
Maybe this is just noise... but I can reproduce this fairly reliably.
Mailbox with 21,000+ messages
This query:
a UID SORT RETURN (ALL COUNT) (DATE) UTF-8 SUBJECT "foo"
is always about 10 percent slower than this split query (I've done
this 4-5 times, and the numbers are similar):
a UID SEARCH RETURN (SAVE) CHARSET UTF-8 SUBJECT "foo"
b UID SORT RETURN (ALL COUNT)
2018 Nov 02
0
error Cached MIME parts don't match message during parsing: Cached header size mismatch (parts=)
> On 2 Nov 2018, at 20.58, Poliman - Serwis <serwis at poliman.pl> wrote:
>
> I have a problem for specific mailbox. In mail.err file I see a lot:
> Nov 2 07:41:17 s1 dovecot: imap(artur at example.pl <mailto:artur at example.pl>): Error: unlink(/var/vmail/example.pl/artur/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache <http://example.pl/artur/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache>) failed: No
2005 Apr 11
0
plotting Principle components vs individual variables.
Dear R,
I'm trying to plot the first principle component of an analysis vs the first
variable but am having trouble. I have no trouble doing the initial plot
but have difficulty thereafter.
First I want to highlight some points of the following data set
list(running)
[[1]]
X100m X200m X400m X800m X1500m X5K X10K Marathon
Argentina 10.39 20.81 46.84 1.81
2005 Apr 11
1
plotting Principal components vs individual variables.
At the cost of breaking the thread I'm going to change your subject and
replace 'Principle' by 'Principal'. I just can't stand it any longer...
OK, here is how I would solve your other problems. First put
> wh <- c("USA", "New Zealand", "Dominican Republic",
"Western Samoa", "Cook Islands")
> ind
2016 May 27
2
Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2
All of our Kafka clusters are fairly write-heavy. The cluster in question is our second-heaviest ? we haven?t yet upgraded the heaviest, due to the issues we?ve been experiencing in this one.
Here is an iostat example from a host within the same cluster, but without the RAID check running:
[root at r2k1 ~] # iostat -xdmc 1 10
Linux 3.10.0-327.13.1.el7.x86_64 (r2k1) 05/27/16 _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
2010 Oct 01
0
ff version 2.2.0
Dear R community,
The next release of package ff is available on CRAN. With kind help of Brian Ripley it now supports the Win64 and Sun versions of R. It has three major functional enhancements:
a) new fast in-memory sorting and ordering functions (single-threaded)
b) ff now supports on-disk sorting and ordering of ff vectors and ffdf dataframes
c) ff integer vectors now can be used as
2010 Oct 01
0
ff version 2.2.0
Dear R community,
The next release of package ff is available on CRAN. With kind help of Brian Ripley it now supports the Win64 and Sun versions of R. It has three major functional enhancements:
a) new fast in-memory sorting and ordering functions (single-threaded)
b) ff now supports on-disk sorting and ordering of ff vectors and ffdf dataframes
c) ff integer vectors now can be used as
2016 Jun 01
0
Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2
I did some additional testing - I stopped Kafka on the host, and kicked off a disk check, and it ran at the expected speed overnight. I started kafka this morning, and the raid check's speed immediately dropped down to ~2000K/Sec.
I then enabled the write-back cache on the drives (hdparm -W1 /dev/sd*). The raid check is now running between 100000K/Sec and 200000K/Sec, and has been for several
2016 May 25
6
Slow RAID Check/high %iowait during check after updgrade from CentOS 6.5 -> CentOS 7.2
I?ve posted this on the forums at https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=57926&p=244614#p244614 - posting to the list in the hopes of getting more eyeballs on it.
We have a cluster of 23 HP DL380p Gen8 hosts running Kafka. Basic specs:
2x E5-2650
128 GB RAM
12 x 4 TB 7200 RPM SATA drives connected to an HP H220 HBA
Dual port 10 GB NIC
The drives are configured as one large
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
Hi,
LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results:
Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4)
Release mode, but with assertions enabled
LLVM srcdir == objdir
# of expected passes 2250
# of expected failures 5
I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC,
so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff"
test the machine was swapping