search for: 2.4.20

hi, - big and ugly mail. If you don't like them, delete it now :-) - I have collected and classified some information of: http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html And I observed that ext3 performance is worse than previous kernels(2.4.19...). -ac and -aa are here only as reference. Complete information is in the upper URL. dbench: Performance is worse. dbench (Numbers are in

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031223/62cf404e/attachment.htm -------------- next part -------------- Hello When I tried loading TDM400P module using insmod command, I get following error messages. Is there some problem with my asterisk installation. Please advise. Thanks Tony $insmod wcfxs Using

Hello, I have ISA card LineJack. I could not find any information if this card can work as fxo with Asterisk. If it can work, can somebody point me how to install it on my Asterisk box. Or maybe there is some documentation about it how to install LineJack. I will be very thankful for any help. Regards Bartosz Jozwiak ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP:

--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Netfilter Core Team Security Advisory =20 CVE: CAN-2003-0187 Subject: Netfilter / Connection Tracking Remote DoS Released: 01 Aug 2003 Effects: Any remote user may be able to DoS a machine

Greetings, I have just tested Syslinux 1.75 and Syslinux 2.00 on a floppy disk that worked fine with Kernel 2.4.19 on a 1.44Mb floppy disk (the kernel about 1.1Mb in size). I decided to update the Kernel to the new 2.4.20 (as well as 2.4.21-pre2 and 2.4.20-ac2) which I tested to work fine when booting from the HDD using Lilo, but when I took my original disk that used 2.4.19 and replaced the

Hello- I've been trying to scour both * and linux user group archives for a solution to this particular problem, but I am just plan stuck. I got the latest zaptel sources from cvs, uncommented ztdummy.o in Makefile, ran make; make install then, did depmod -a. All is well up until now. When i do modprobe ztdummy, i get this error: dv@sidetrack:/usr/local/src/zaptel# depmod -a

Hi all i need urgent help our entire switchboard is down only 5 days after it came up. this is the second time this has happened and i am thinking that asterisk is not worth the trouble it gives. mostly it runs without hassle. but around 2 weeks ago during the test phase we rebooted the machine and did the normal modprobes and this error popped up. coming back to work after the weekend the

In 2.4.20-pre5 an optimisation was made to the ext3 fsync function which can very easily cause file data corruption at unmount time. This was first reported by Nick Piggin on November 29th (one day after 2.4.20 was released, and three months after the bug was merged. Unfortunate timing) This only affects filesystems which were mounted with the `data=journal' option. Or files which are

I can either get the TE100P working or the 3 X100P clones working, but never both. I have the TE100P connected to a channel bank, and X100P clones to lines from the phone company. This is my zaptel.conf span=1,1,0,d4,ami fxsks=1-24 loadzone=us fxols=25-27 loadzone=us I then do [root@asterix root]# modprobe zaptel [root@asterix root]# modprobe wcte11xp ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel

This patch fixes an inefficiency and potential system lockup in the 2.4 kernel's ext3 filesystem. The problem has been present since 2.4.20-pre5. This patch is applicable to 2.4.20. A copy is at http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.4/2.4.20/ext3-scheduling-storm.patch Anyone who is using tasks which have realtime scheduling policy on ext3 systems should apply this change.

Hi, I got the OOPS below on my laptop running vanilla 2.4.20-ac2; I had to copy it byhand so it may not be 100% accurate. It hasn't happened again, and this is the first problem I've had with this kernel (or any other kernel, for that matter.) Anyway, I'm not sure, if a) this is actually an ext3 problem, b) OOPS reports of 2.4.20-ac2 are of any interest, so I won't bother with

when doing somehitng like ip rule add fwmark 3 nat 200.42.75.183 table ppp0 prio 1 (the idea is that packets that match the fwmark 3 change their source address to 200.42.75.183)..it first apply the nat and then routes to table ppp0 right? in such case the, nat, why may be nat not being applyed? cause it doesnt work at all..it goes to that interface but does not nat the src address of the package.

I''m currently running kernel 2.4.20 + the MPPE patch (linux-2.4.16-openssl-0.9.6b-mppe.patch). [root@gateway root]# uname -a Linux gateway.shorewall.net 2.4.20 #2 Thu Dec 5 18:02:38 PST 2002 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@gateway root]# Seems to be OK with Shorewall. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy AIM: tmeastep \ http://shorewall.sf.net ICQ: #60745924 \

hello, got anybody succesfully setup asterisk with three avm fritz pci cards - using the howto described in http://www.quiss.org/caiviar/Two-Fritzcards-HOWTO i already have asterisk working with 2 cards, by when i add third card and compile driver ( see capiinit debug below ) asterisk freeze on capi initialization.... does anybody know how to solve this ? regards Marian ------------------

Hi everyone, I need a 2.4.20 kernel patch for ext3 file system. It's corrupting our data. I did some google, and all pages led to this page http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ Where all the link to the patches I need are broken. Anyone can help me get these patches? OR I'm running 2.4.20 kernel right now, if I just do the kernel upgrade, do I still need to patch for ext3?

Hi, I am using linux 2.4.14 box for my bandwidth management.I patched the kernel for HTB support.I think HTB comes by default with 2.4.20.My doubt is "Is there any performance difference between patched kernel i.e. 2.4.14 and unpatched kernel 2.4.20 with respect to bandwidth management ?" Thanks in advance, Aravind. Yahoo! India Careers: Over 50,000 jobsonline.

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68 Summary: Kernel panic Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Hi everyone. I am running Gentoo on my server and samba 2.2.8a. Recently I changed kernel version from linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r10 to linux-2.4.20-wolk4.0s. And now I have performance issue with samba. Ok many of you will probably say that move to vanilla sources...well I ried it too and it didn't work. I have 100mb LAN and two computers (linux + Windows2000). Linux server shares directory with

intel etherexpress pro 100 nics at my lan, server with tftp, nfsserver and pxelinux running for about half a year at my lan. Hi, When I use a kernel v.2.4.20 the pxe boot loads the pxefiles, kernel and then stops asking for files from the server and complains about a "Root-NFS: No NFS server available, giving up." and messages about to insert a disk... ... the same .config used with

I need a timing device for the DL360G2 for conferencing and meetme. For a timing device I have 2 X100P cards but neither will work in my DL360G2. The system will not even boot with either card in the system. Other PCI cards seems to work fine. I called Digium support and was told that there must be a conflict between the card and my Compaq DL360G2. I then moved on to ztdummy. I'm sure the