search for: 2.3g

"qemu-img convert" detects zeroes in allocated areas and punch holes in the destination image. This may save space on the destination image, but slows down conversion when using outputs such as rhv-upload, which have very large overhead per requests. Using the -S flag, we can treat small areas filled with zeroes as data, limiting the number of requests, and speeding the operation. Here

Hi, Over the past several days I have been trying to get the shadow to work with samba but haven't been successful. Can someone check below config and let me know if I am missing something? We are using Equallogic SAN and iSCSI LUNS to mount volumes. I can cleanly access samba shares on Windows 7 clients but just not shadow copy. I have referred the official how-to but couldn't get it to

Hello, I''m doing one emergencial migrate for one very old machine, because we will have one IMPLOSION (!!!) very close from here, and I''m thinking that this old IDE disk will not survive... :-/ [root@registro-2 /root]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/ida/c0d0p2 3.8G 2.3G 1.4G 62% / /dev/ida/c0d0p8 26G 20G 4.4G 82% /data

Hello, I am curious why when using virt-sparsify the apparent-size of the file gets reduced to the actual file size? Is there a way to get the apparent-size left as the full size? In the man page for virt-sparsify it has a section on "IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT SPARSE OUTPUT IMAGES" and its output seems to indicate what I would expect where "ls -lh" shows the full apparent size

Hello, I am curious why when using virt-sparsify the apparent-size of the file gets reduced to the actual file size? Is there a way to get the apparent-size left as the full size? In the man page for virt-sparsify it has a section on "IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT SPARSE OUTPUT IMAGES" and its output seems to indicate what I would expect where "ls -lh" shows the full apparent size

Greetings - I am going through some testing steps to expand a logical volume and the corresponding filesystem on a KVM guest and have run across a deficiency in my knowledge. I spent the afternoon yesterday googling for answers, but had have come up blank still. What I am trying to do is resize the file system to use the additional disk space that I added to the logical volume that the

I am running a fairly new box, Athlon 1.4Ghz, 512 Mb RAM, RedHat 7.3, rsync rsync version 2.5.4 protocol version 26, it's disk layout is; bash-2.05a# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 372M 338M 15M 96% / /dev/sda1 45M 8.9M 34M 21% /boot /dev/sda5 703M 218M 449M 33% /home none 251M 0

Hullo Everybody ; I am failing to start my new VM and it tells me unkown bootloader . Below are my parameters and output . Could somebody be having an idea of putting right this problem? [root@virtualintranet /]# xe vm-param-list uuid=70645ba3-bcbc-683b-099e-ed197301fcc2 uuid ( RO) : 70645ba3-bcbc-683b-099e-ed197301fcc2 name-label ( RW): PVG1

Hi All Is there a tool to monitor qemu-kvm guest vm memory usage ( free in guest vm)?Nowadays, I have already researched some methods:1. qemu-kvm process memory usage.? ? ?Since qemu-kvm process memory usage always increases as time goes on, it will not reflect the memory usage in vm.2.?virsh dommemstat? ? ?Just as method 1.3.?virsh qemu-monitor-command --hmp [domain name] "info mem"? ?

This is an issue that I have been having with one of our production servers for a couple of months, just out of no where /var goes to read only. There aren't any errors that show up in /var/log/messages nor dmesg, I checked to make sure that the drives on error option is set to continue and there isn't anything as far as I can tell wrong with the disks. Also there is plenty of disk space.

Hello, I'm in a slightly unusual situation and I'd really appreciate some advice. I installed CentOS 5.2 on a server about a month ago. Today I happened to check the 'free' command and noticed that the Swap line reads as follows: Swap: 0 0 0 I'm pretty certain that when I installed the OS and created a custom partition table, that I defined a

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:20:54AM -0500, libvirt_users@skagitattic.com wrote: > Hello, > > I am curious why when using virt-sparsify the apparent-size of the file > gets reduced to the actual file size? Is there a way to get the > apparent-size left as the full size? > > In the man page for virt-sparsify it has a section on > "IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT SPARSE OUTPUT

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:20:54AM -0500, libvirt_users@skagitattic.com wrote: > Hello, > > I am curious why when using virt-sparsify the apparent-size of the file > gets reduced to the actual file size? Is there a way to get the > apparent-size left as the full size? > > In the man page for virt-sparsify it has a section on > "IMPORTANT NOTE ABOUT SPARSE OUTPUT

Hello Rich, Thanks for the reply and information. > What is file.img? Its simply a file I made while testing sparse files "truncate -s 512M file.img". > 'du --apparent-size' and 'ls -l' are the same thing, so it's not > really surprising that you see the same numbers here. Indeed, I expected those to be the same, just figured I would show them both for

From e2d47e2f75bac6876b7c2eaecfe946966bf27516 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 04:53:17 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] VMX: wbinvd when vmentry under UC This patch flush cache when vmentry back to UC guest, to prevent cache polluted by hypervisor access guest memory during UC mode. However, wbinvd is a _very_ time consuming operation, so 1.

I managed to get NFS statistics just before server rebooted. I can reproduce this every time. Question: Am I saturating the SATA bus on the NFS server so violently with the SSDs that the server hard reboots? Perhaps due to the RAID 6 nature of operations? Server info AMD EPYC 7281 16CORE 32 GIG RAM 6xSATA3 SSD 1.9TB in mdadm RAID6 OS: Centos 7.6 SATA controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Good morning, in order to post proper documentation, what logs (or log level) do I need to troubleshoot a Centos 7.6.1810 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64 tha tis running a NFS server on top LVM on top of XFS on top of VDO on top of MDAM on a 6 SSD disk RAID6 ? This physical NFS server is servign 2 NFS v4.2 shares to 2 physical KVM virtualization hosts. When remote NFS clients start doing intensive

Hi, I just installed FreeBSD 9.0-release / amd64 on a new machine (Acer Aspire X1470). I installed from a usb memory stick (the default amd64 image), which I booted by pressing "F12" and selecting it from the boot menu on the machine. I installed on a SSD (which replaced the hard drive originally in the machine), using the default scheme for 9.0 (GPT). The installation was painless (many

Thanks for the clarification. That behaviour is quite weird as arbiter bricks should hold?only metadata. What does the following show on host?uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01: du -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brickdu -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick3/brickdu -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick2/brick If indeed the shards are taking space -?that is a really strange situation.From which version

Hi Strahil, This is the output from the commands: root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# du -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick 2.2G /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.glusterfs 24M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/scalelite-recordings 16K /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/mytute 18M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.shard 0