search for: 2.20e

Hallo, I have this dataset with repeated measures. There are two within-subject factors, "formant" (2 levels: 1 and 2) and "f2 Ref" (25 levels: 670, 729, 788, 846, 905, 1080, 1100, 1120, 1140, 1170, 1480, 1470, 1450, 1440, 1430, 1890, 1840, 1790, 1740, 1690, 2290, 2210, 2120, 2040, 1950), and one between-subject factor, lang (2 levels:1 and 2). The response variable

hello all, Quick question, how do I get the p value out of the anova? Thanks, Paul > pb<-aov(as.numeric(diff[5,16:33]) ~ grF) > summary(pb) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) grF 3 2.7860e+10 9.2867e+09 4.2236 0.02534 * Residuals 14 3.0783e+10 2.1988e+09 --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 '

The PDF file on the web, which is an appendix on nonlinear regression associated with the CAR book, is very nice. When I ran through the code presented there, I found something odd. The code does a certain model in 3 ways: Vanilla NLS (using numerical differentation), Analytical derivatives (where the user supplies the derivatives) and analytical derivatives (using automatic differentiation). The

Hi List, My goal is to force R not to print in scientific notation in the sixth column (rel_diff - for the p-value) of my data frame (not a matrix). I have used the format.pval () and printCoefmat () functions on the data frame. The R script is appended below. This issue is that use of the format.pval () and printCoefmat () functions on the data frame gives me the desired results, but coerces

Hello! I'm puzzled by the following problem. It occurs while trying to predict responses in a test-dataset using a linear model fitted with regFit from the rMetrics "fRegression"-package. All goes well when I call "predict" using the training dataset. However, a call using the test-dataset retuns an error message - telling me that the latter dataset provides variables

Ok. I did some quality tests. First off; never do quality tests with ints. I had serious problems interpreting my results until it dawned on me that the signal differences were just 0 or 1. So, after a lot of scratching my head, these are done comparing the result from the _float versions (which is how both resamplers work internally anyway). What I did was this: Load speex_wb.wav as one

>> Yes, I plan to use it in a VoIP environment if I can get latency reduced to >> an acceptable level :) >> The latency depends directly on the overlap parameter, which also controls >> the quality. Higher quality => higher latency. You could set the overlap to >> 0, but that would give you some nasty artifacts. >> You can also resample with smaller block