Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "1ootpii".
2016 Feb 17
2
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
...eate a new file in /etc/sysctl.d/
called something like 99-postgres.conf and put youjr mods in there.
That way it will never change.
Also .. verify all the files in /etc/sysctl.d/ and /etc/sysctl.conf are
set to this label for selinux:
unconfined_u:object_r:etc_t:s0
See this for labeling:
red.ht/1ooTpiI
But, /etc/sysctl.conf should still work in centos-7.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/2016...
2016 Feb 17
0
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
...thing like 99-postgres.conf and put youjr mods in there.
> That way it will never change.
>
> Also .. verify all the files in /etc/sysctl.d/ and /etc/sysctl.conf are
> set to this label for selinux:
>
> unconfined_u:object_r:etc_t:s0
>
> See this for labeling:
> red.ht/1ooTpiI
>
> But, /etc/sysctl.conf should still work in centos-7.
Looks like that is working (it seems to be reading your /etc/sysctl.conf
file) based on your other post in this thread.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: applicat...
2016 Feb 17
2
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
...ut youjr mods in there.
>> That way it will never change.
>>
>> Also .. verify all the files in /etc/sysctl.d/ and /etc/sysctl.conf are
>> set to this label for selinux:
>>
>> unconfined_u:object_r:etc_t:s0
>>
>> See this for labeling:
>> red.ht/1ooTpiI
>>
>> But, /etc/sysctl.conf should still work in centos-7.
>
> Looks like that is working (it seems to be reading your /etc/sysctl.conf
> file) based on your other post in this thread.
Hi Johnny,
Excuse my ignorance, if the sysctl.conf is working then why would my
database t...
2016 Feb 17
1
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted,
> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest.
>
> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as
> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway:
> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2016-February/021705.html
>
> Here is a good link to figure out what to
2016 Feb 17
4
New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547
On 02/17/2016 07:08 AM, Michael H wrote:
> On 17/02/16 13:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what
>> is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that
>> needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list
>> of updates.
>>
>> We released a new glibc yesterday for