Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "1min20s".
2019 Feb 23
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
Hi,
Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster? Looking
of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes 1min6s-1min20s) I
see two things:
1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half of
the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging .obj
files to deduplicate type infoma...
2019 Feb 24
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...is area recently
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:07 AM Leonardo Santagada via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster? Looking
of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes 1min6s-1min20s) I
see two things:
1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half of
the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging .obj
files to deduplicate type infoma...
2019 Feb 25
4
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...area recently
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:07 AM Leonardo Santagada via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster? Looking
> of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes 1min6s-1min20s) I
> see two things:
>
> 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half of
> the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
>
> Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging .o...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 4:07 AM Leonardo Santagada via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> >
> > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half
> > of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
> >
> > Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone...
2019 Feb 25
3
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...M Leonardo Santagada via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> > >
> > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost
> > > half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
> > >
> > > Is anyone work...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...s.llvm.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
>> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
>> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
>> > > >
>> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost
>> > > > half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
>> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
>>...
2019 Feb 25
5
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...;> > > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> >> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> >> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost
> >> > > > half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> >> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addOb...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...vm.org>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
>> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
>> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
>> > > >
>> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost
>> > > > half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
>> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
>>...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...> >> > > > Hi,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> > >> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > >> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so
> > >> > > > almost half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> > >> > > > 2) There is no paralleliza...
2019 Feb 27
4
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...gt; > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD
> faster?
> > > > >> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > > > >> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so
> > > > >> > > > almost half of the time of linking, mostly finding
> duplicates
> > > > >&...
2019 Feb 28
3
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...> > Hi,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> > > >> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > > >> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so
> > > >> > > > almost half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> > > >> > > > 2) The...