search for: 1m4s

...his what people actually want? We didn't consciously choose compression level 9. That was just the default compression level for zlib::compress function. For an experiment, I created a patch to use compression level 1 instead of 9 and linked clang using that modified lld. By default, lld takes 1m4s to link clang with --compress-debug-sections=zlib. With that patch, it took only 31s. Here is a comparison of clang executable size with various configurations: no debug sections: 275 MB level 9 compression: 855 MB level 1 compression: 922 MB no compression: 2044 MB Given that the best...

...--------------- | replicated | ~5m10s | ~59s | ~1m6s | ~1m19s | ~1m49s | --------------------------------------------------------------- | distributed | ~4m18s | ~41s | ~57s | ~2m24s | ~1m38s | --------------------------------------------------------------- | dist-repl | ~8m18s | ~1m4s | ~1m11s | ~1m24s | ~2m40s | --------------------------------------------------------------- | native FS | ~11s | ~4s | ~2s | ~56s | ~10s | --------------------------------------------------------------- I get the same results, whether with default configurations with custom con...

...? We didn't consciously choose compression level 9. > That was just the default compression level for zlib::compress function. > > > > For an experiment, I created a patch to use compression level 1 instead > of 9 and linked clang using that modified lld. By default, lld takes 1m4s > to link clang with --compress-debug-sections=zlib. With that patch, it > took only 31s. > > > > Here is a comparison of clang executable size with various > configurations: > > > > no debug sections: 275 MB > > level 9 compression: 855 MB > > level...

...replicated | ~5m10s | ~59s | ~1m6s | ~1m19s | ~1m49s | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > | distributed | ~4m18s | ~41s | ~57s | ~2m24s | ~1m38s | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > | dist-repl | ~8m18s | ~1m4s | ~1m11s | ~1m24s | ~2m40s | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > | native FS | ~11s | ~4s | ~2s | ~56s | ~10s | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > I get the same results, whether with default configurat...

...? We didn't consciously choose compression level 9. > That was just the default compression level for zlib::compress function. > > > > For an experiment, I created a patch to use compression level 1 instead > of 9 and linked clang using that modified lld. By default, lld takes 1m4s > to link clang with --compress-debug-sections=zlib. With that patch, it > took only 31s. > > > > Here is a comparison of clang executable size with various > configurations: > > > > no debug sections: 275 MB > > level 9 compression: 855 MB > > level...

...n level 9. >>> That was just the default compression level for zlib::compress function. >>> > >>> > For an experiment, I created a patch to use compression level 1 >>> instead of 9 and linked clang using that modified lld. By default, lld >>> takes 1m4s to link clang with --compress-debug-sections=zlib. With that >>> patch, it took only 31s. >>> > >>> > Here is a comparison of clang executable size with various >>> configurations: >>> > >>> > no debug sections: 275 MB >>&gt...

...just the default compression level for zlib::compress function. >>>>> > >>>>> > For an experiment, I created a patch to use compression level 1 >>>>> instead of 9 and linked clang using that modified lld. By default, lld >>>>> takes 1m4s to link clang with --compress-debug-sections=zlib. With that >>>>> patch, it took only 31s. >>>>> > >>>>> > Here is a comparison of clang executable size with various >>>>> configurations: >>>>> > >>>>&g...

On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 8, 2014 10:08 AM, "Gene Cumm" <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> vNIC not VMNet. AMD PCNet32 vlance, Intel e1000, Intel e1000e, VMware >>> VMXNet3? Feel free to