Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "1m38s".
Did you mean:
1m30s
2015 Jun 01
1
GlusterFS 3.7 - slow/poor performances
...| ~3m45s | ~43s | ~47s | ~3m10s | ~3m15s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| replicated | ~5m10s | ~59s | ~1m6s | ~1m19s | ~1m49s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| distributed | ~4m18s | ~41s | ~57s | ~2m24s | ~1m38s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| dist-repl | ~8m18s | ~1m4s | ~1m11s | ~1m24s | ~2m40s |
---------------------------------------------------------------
| native FS | ~11s | ~4s | ~2s | ~56s | ~10s |
-----------------------------------------...
2015 Jun 02
2
GlusterFS 3.7 - slow/poor performances
...43s | ~47s | ~3m10s | ~3m15s |
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> | replicated | ~5m10s | ~59s | ~1m6s | ~1m19s | ~1m49s |
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> | distributed | ~4m18s | ~41s | ~57s | ~2m24s | ~1m38s |
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> | dist-repl | ~8m18s | ~1m4s | ~1m11s | ~1m24s | ~2m40s |
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> | native FS | ~11s | ~4s | ~2s | ~56s | ~10s |
> --------------------...
2010 Jun 12
3
Speed/latency issues for development in a Wine environment
...nute estimate it is reasonable to
ascribe all the difference to Wine startup latency. So let's also take
that as a working hypothesis to explain the Wine I versus Linux I
discrepancy of ~13 minutes (where I am not sure how many commands are run)
and the Wine III versus Linux III discrepancy of 1m38s (where I know
many fewer commands were run than in the Wine II and Linux II cases).
Given the known Wine startup latency for simple commands and the possibility
that all these timing comparsion results for the same build on Linux and
Wine can be explained by that, what can I do to reduce that late...