Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "1en".
Did you mean:
1e
2006 Jun 23
1
''Series'' Pluralization
...have a model I called ''content_series''. I created it and noticed that
Rails called it ''Sery'', so I added ''series'' to the uncountable thing in
the config, like this:
Inflector.inflections do |inflect|
# inflect.plural /^(ox)$/i, ''\1en''
# inflect.singular /^(ox)en/i, ''\1''
# inflect.irregular ''person'', ''people''
inflect.uncountable %w( series )
end
Everything seems to work alright except for my tests.
nevans@bell:/var/www2/freepets/test/unit$ ls
content_seri...
2006 Jan 19
4
Using RoR pluralization rules
Hello,
RoR seems to be aware of plurals like category=>categories etc..I Want to
be able to use this in my application to relate some keywords.Is it possible
?or does RoR itself use some ruby library?
Thanks
Vivek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060119/d5660663/attachment.html
2006 May 22
3
Syntax error when running dispatch.cgi
Hi,
when I execute dispatch.cgi at the command line, I get the following
error message:
[cg@cg rails]$ ./public/dispatch.cgi
./public/dispatch.cgi:3:in `require'':
./public/../config/environment.rb:8: syntax error, unexpected ''<''
(SyntaxError)
<%= ''# '' if freeze %>RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''<%= Rails::VERSION::STRING %>''
2006 Nov 18
1
Xen 3.0.3 with CentOS 4.4
...essor Core ID: 1
(XEN) VMXON is done root 36471
(XEN) Intel machine check architecture supported.
-r
(XEN) Intel machine check reporting enabled o
(XEN) ENABLING IO-APIC IRQsmp 17901 Oct 1 15:30
(XEN) -> Using new ACK method
(XEN) ..TIMER: vector=0xF0 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1
pin2=-1en-hotplug.log
(XEN) checking TSC synchronization across 2 CPUs: passed. Oct 21 16:01
xend-debug.log
(XEN) Platform timer is 14.318MHz HPET-r--r-- 1 root root 990595 Oct
(XEN) Brought up 2 CPUs
(XEN) Machine check exception polling timer started.t 1048323 Sep
27 20:07 xend.log.1
(XEN) *** LO...
2009 Jul 20
9
Upgrade server to run on Rails 2.3.2/F11
Note that one of the 8 patches (#6) will be sent separately in reply
to this email, as some of the replaced lines are too long, so git
won't let me send the email. However, there is nothing wrong with
that patch, and it should be applied in the sequence listed below.
Note also that I assume this will be tested on a clean f11 install, rather
than an upgrade of an existing ovirt server