Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "1ea433a5e118".
2014 Dec 23
2
[PATCH V2 2/4] pwr: make nouveau_pwr_pgob() non-static
...-
>
> v2: this patch is added since v2. (v1 is the RFC actually)
>
> nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c | 2 +-
> nvkm/subdev/pwr/priv.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c b/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
> index 0ab55f27ec45..1ea433a5e118 100644
> --- a/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
> +++ b/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>
> #include "priv.h"
>
> -static void
> +void
> nouveau_pwr_pgob(struct nouveau_pwr *ppwr, bool enable)
> {
> const struct nvkm_pwr_impl *impl = (void...
2014 Dec 22
0
[PATCH V2 2/4] pwr: make nouveau_pwr_pgob() non-static
...by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com>
---
v2: this patch is added since v2. (v1 is the RFC actually)
nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c | 2 +-
nvkm/subdev/pwr/priv.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c b/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
index 0ab55f27ec45..1ea433a5e118 100644
--- a/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
+++ b/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
#include "priv.h"
-static void
+void
nouveau_pwr_pgob(struct nouveau_pwr *ppwr, bool enable)
{
const struct nvkm_pwr_impl *impl = (void *)nv_oclass(ppwr);
diff --git a/nvkm/subdev/pwr/priv.h b/nvkm...
2015 Jan 04
0
[PATCH V2 2/4] pwr: make nouveau_pwr_pgob() non-static
...s added since v2. (v1 is the RFC actually)
>>
>> nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c | 2 +-
>> nvkm/subdev/pwr/priv.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c b/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
>> index 0ab55f27ec45..1ea433a5e118 100644
>> --- a/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
>> +++ b/nvkm/subdev/pwr/base.c
>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>> #include "priv.h"
>> -static void
>> +void
>> nouveau_pwr_pgob(struct nouveau_pwr *ppwr, bool enable)
>> {
>> const struct...
2014 Dec 22
7
[PATCH V2 1/4] clk: allow non-blocking for nouveau_clock_astate()
There might be some callers of nouveau_clock_astate(), and they are from
inetrrupt context. So we must ensure that this function can be atomic in
that condition. This patch adds one parameter which is subsequently passed
to nouveau_pstate_calc(). Therefore we can choose whether we want to wait
for the pstate work's completion or not.
Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com>
---