search for: 1d36dc48

On Feb 17, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > Then my question: will there be any objection if I disentangle AsanCoverage from ASan and make it a separate LLVM phase with the proper clang driver support? > Or it will be an unwelcome competition with the planned clang coverage? I don’t view it as a competition, but assuming that we both succeed in our

...coverage=per-function,counter > -coverage=per-block,counter > -coverage=per-function,boolean > -coverage=per-block,boolean > > --kcc > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140218/1d36dc48/attachment.html>