search for: 1ch

...float* getelementptr ([4 x float]* cast (<4 x float>* %_ARGB56 to [4 x float]*), int 0, int 2) store float 0.000000e+000, float* getelementptr ([4 x float]* cast (<4 x float>* %_ARGB56 to [4 x float]*), int 0, int 3) ret void } Generated with ISelPattern: 17160410 sub esp,1Ch 17160413 mov dword ptr ds:[161D6240h],0 1716041D mov dword ptr ds:[161D6244h],0 17160427 mov dword ptr ds:[161D6248h],0 17160431 mov dword ptr ds:[161D624Ch],0 1716043B mov eax,76E4560h 17160440 mov dword ptr [esp],eax 17160443 call HueV...

Hello, I am trying to make the FP intrinsics (abs, sin, cos, sqrt) I've added work with the X86ISelPattern, but I'm having some difficulties understanding what needs to be done. I assume I have to add new nodetypes for the FP instructions to SelectionDAGNodes.h, and make nodes for these in SelectionDAGLowering::visitCall when I find the intrinsic... The part I don't quite

Hi, I get an error with 'make check' in version 0.9.1 Testing asynchronous tandeming (44100Hz, 1ch, 240 samples, 8 - 88 bytes). Error: Signal out of expected range. 44100 1 240 8 258.102814 FAIL: tandem-test Anyone else - or is it just me? til

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a BIOS that has a broken timer. I think tho that the user tick interrupt 1ch works. I was trying to write four functions in assembler to fix the problem. new_timer check_timer install_timer uninstall_timer The check timer was going to simply get the value of BIOS_timer use int 15h function 86h to sleep 1 tick then compare the two values. If they were different then the ti...

...edi 002C13F1 pop esi 002C13F2 pop ebx 002C13F3 mov esp,ebp 002C13F5 pop ebp 002C13F6 ret *Callee( 'fetch' LLVM ):* 010B0010 mov eax,dword ptr [esp+4] 010B0014 mov ecx,dword ptr [esp+8] 010B0018 movss xmm0,dword ptr [ecx+1Ch] 010B001D movss dword ptr [eax+0Ch],xmm0 010B0022 movss xmm0,dword ptr [ecx+18h] 010B0027 movss dword ptr [eax+8],xmm0 010B002C movss xmm0,dword ptr [ecx+10h] 010B0031 movss xmm1,dword ptr [ecx+14h] 010B0036 movss dword ptr [eax+4],xmm1 010B003B movss...

...he BIR is a PCI concept which describes which BAR should be used: "Indicates which one of a function?s Base Address registers, located beginning at 10h in Configuration space, is used to map the function?s MSI-X Table into memory space. BIR Value Base Address register 0 10h 1 14h 2 18h 3 1Ch 4 20h 5 24h 6 Reserved 7 Reserved" While the offset will provide a 32-bit aligned offset into the memory region and will point to the appropriate config space. First, we will look at the virtio-pci configuration space, which has been simplified from the original. virtio-pci header: +--...

...he BIR is a PCI concept which describes which BAR should be used: "Indicates which one of a function?s Base Address registers, located beginning at 10h in Configuration space, is used to map the function?s MSI-X Table into memory space. BIR Value Base Address register 0 10h 1 14h 2 18h 3 1Ch 4 20h 5 24h 6 Reserved 7 Reserved" While the offset will provide a 32-bit aligned offset into the memory region and will point to the appropriate config space. First, we will look at the virtio-pci configuration space, which has been simplified from the original. virtio-pci header: +--...

...Error: celt_decode returned unknown error Error: celt_decode returned unknown error Error: celt_decode returned unknown error Error: at 30 bytes_per_frame celt_decode returned unknown error CELT codec tests. Random seed: 1844038323 (DD39) Testing asynchronous tandeming (48000Hz, 1ch, 960 samples, 30 - 320 bytes). FAIL: tandem-test =================== 1 of 8 tests failed =================== make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/tmp/celt-0.11.3/tests' make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving direct...

This set of patches add some support for sector size >512. Currently it fixes extlinux, MBR for GPT and ext partitions. Other code is unaffected. This set of patches has been tested on a read Dell machine running a beta firmware.

...t;BI086=E4VEZ92!#,D1?030O030Z(@T*/#P@+U!A9V53 M:7IE6S4Y-2`X-#)=("`@/CX@<V5T<&%G961E=FEC90T*)5-#25!01#H@1$9% M($]-7U!A<&5R7U-I>F4@4$)?031?4`T*)5-#25!01#H@1$9%($]-7T]R:65N M="!00E]"15-47T9)5`T*(@T**D5N9`T**E!A9V53:7IE($,R1%\W+C(U>#$P M+C53148O-RXR-7@Q,"XU(%-%1CHB#0H\/"`O4&%G95-I>F5;-3(R(#<U-ET@ M("`@/CX@<V5T<&%G961E=FEC90T*)5-#25!01#H@1$9%($]-7U!A<&5R7U-I M>F4@4$)?-U\Q,`T*)5-#25!01#H@1$9%($]-7T]R:65N="!00E]3148-"B(- M"BI%;F0-"BI086=E4VEZ92!#,D1?-RXR-7@Q,"XU+S<N,C5X,3`N-3HB#0H\ M/"`O4&...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking