Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "1ce".
Did you mean:
1c
2002 Jul 12
3
ext3 corruption
Hello,
Over the last month or so, I've noticed the following error showing up
repeatedly in my system logs under kernel 2.4.18-ac3 and more recently
under 2.4.19-rc1:
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,3)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28
I've now been able to capture the following Oops before the system went
down entirely:
Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611:
2020 Aug 31
2
Vectorization of math function failed?
...c5 fa 11 43 30 vmovss %xmm0,0x30(%rbx)
1b5: c5 fa 10 43 34 vmovss 0x34(%rbx),%xmm0
1ba: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 1bf <_Z4fct3Pf+0xdf>
1bf: c5 fa 11 43 34 vmovss %xmm0,0x34(%rbx)
1c4: c5 fa 10 43 38 vmovss 0x38(%rbx),%xmm0
1c9: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 1ce <_Z4fct3Pf+0xee>
1ce: c5 fa 11 43 38 vmovss %xmm0,0x38(%rbx)
1d3: c5 fa 10 43 3c vmovss 0x3c(%rbx),%xmm0
1d8: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 1dd <_Z4fct3Pf+0xfd>
1dd: c5 fa 11 43 3c vmovss %xmm0,0x3c(%rbx)
1e2: 48 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%rsp
1e6: 5b...
2004 Jul 15
2
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
...)
> :) In my personal view of the
> world, I think that 2 or 3 months between a release is about right.
4 releases per year is pretty standard. 1 per quarter. Certainly the
frequency shouldn't be less unless there is some strong need or a given
release proves problematic to test, but 1ce per quarter suits me well.
>
> Thoughts?
Now you have them :)
Reid
2020 Sep 01
2
Vector evolution?
...c5 f8 29 4c 07 50 vmovaps %xmm1,0x50(%rdi,%rax,1)
1b6: c5 f8 59 4c 07 60 vmulps 0x60(%rdi,%rax,1),%xmm0,%xmm1
1bc: c5 f8 29 4c 07 60 vmovaps %xmm1,0x60(%rdi,%rax,1)
1c2: c5 f8 59 4c 07 70 vmulps 0x70(%rdi,%rax,1),%xmm0,%xmm1
1c8: c5 f8 29 4c 07 70 vmovaps %xmm1,0x70(%rdi,%rax,1)
1ce: 48 83 e8 80 sub $0xffffffffffffff80,%rax
1d2: 48 3d 00 10 00 00 cmp $0x1000,%rax
1d8: 75 96 jne 170 <_Z4fct6PDv4_f+0x10>
1da: c3 retq
My CPU being Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz, I have AVX2. So
should the compiler understa...
2004 Aug 06
0
AW: ices2 and old icecast?
...ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Karl Heyes [mailto:k.heyes@blueyonder.co.uk]
Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Mai 2003 21:56
An: Paul
Betreff: RE: ices2 and old icecast?
<p>I haven't tried building ices2 on FBSD 5 yet, so knowing what errors
show up would be helpful.
My tailored code bases are on www.1ce.org/xiph. The ices/libshout combo
on there may very well build on FBSD5 but the config file format is
slightly different to CVS so if you try those check out the conf/
directory.
The icecast on there is pretty much CVS with a couple of pending fixes
and build updates. This you may want to try.
I...
2004 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
...onal view of the
> > world, I think that 2 or 3 months between a release is about right.
>
> 4 releases per year is pretty standard. 1 per quarter. Certainly the
> frequency shouldn't be less unless there is some strong need or a given
> release proves problematic to test, but 1ce per quarter suits me well.
There is always a tension between releasing too frequently (so people
never bother to run the latest and greatest) or releasing too slowly (CVS
drifts too much from the latest release). I agree that a release every 3
months seems best.
-Chris
--
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.e...
2011 Jul 17
3
How to convert number (matlab) to date
Hello
I am new to R and I need to convert some dates (numeric format by matlab) to actual dates in R.
For instance,
Matlab -> 730456 -> >> datestr(730456)
ans =
02-Dec-1999
R -
> library(zoo)
> as.Date(730456)
[1] "3969-12-03"
I don't not mind the output format but it needs to be right.
Many thanks
Ed
2004 Jul 15
0
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT)
> Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> > Sorry! LLVM 1.3 will probably be out in a few weeks...
>
> Speaking of which, what are your intentions for 1.3? Are you waiting on CPR?
> Anything else? We're starting to get some traction with more developers and
> I think doing
2004 Jul 15
3
[LLVMdev] Constants.cpp:368: error: `INT8_MAX' undeclared (firstuse this function)
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:43:27 -0500 (CDT)
Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
> Sorry! LLVM 1.3 will probably be out in a few weeks...
Speaking of which, what are your intentions for 1.3? Are you waiting on CPR?
Anything else? We're starting to get some traction with more developers and
I think doing a release sooner rather than later might be worth it for all
parties
2008 Jul 24
2
You didn't give me some packages, so now I'm giving you some! R, TexLive, LyX, Gnumeric, etc.
...l-2008 08:09 1.0M
emacs-auctex-el-11.8..> 17-Jul-2008 22:31 355k
emacs-common-22.2-4C..> 22-Jul-2008 08:03 19.3M
emacs-debuginfo-22.2..> 22-Jul-2008 08:00 4.6M
emacs-el-22.2-4Cento..> 22-Jul-2008 08:01 11.0M
emacs-nox-22.2-4Cent..> 22-Jul-2008 08:00 1.7M
evince-2.20.1-1Cento..> 22-Jul-2008 07:59 1.2M
evince-debuginfo-2.2..> 22-Jul-2008 08:03 1.1M
gnome-doc-utils-0.12..> 22-Jul-2008 08:09 275k
gnome-doc-utils-styl..> 22-Jul-2008 08:09 123k
gnome-icon-theme-2.1..> 22-Jul-2008 08:09 3.4M
gnumeric-1.8.2-2Cent..> 22-Jul-2008 08:03 11.7M...