Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "1c8aecdc".
2007 Feb 17
0
[LLVMdev] Unused malloc/free don't get optimized
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> That's surprising to me. I thought there was a pass that converts
> malloc's that trivially dominate all free's and whose pointer doesn't
> escape would be lowered to alloca's -- but I looked and couldn't find one.
nope, there isn't one.
> Why isn't there one? Because it wouldn't be profitable? Or because
2007 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Unused malloc/free don't get optimized
...robably easily modify it to make it
simpler and more conservative.
Rob
Robert L. Bocchino Jr.
Ph.D. Student
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070216/1c8aecdc/attachment.html>
2007 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Unused malloc/free don't get optimized
Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 18:54 +0100, Nicola Lugato wrote:
>
>>I've made some other test and it looks like it don't remove even
>>simple malloc/free couple. Maybe there's something wrong in the way i
>>use the opt command.
>
> No, there's not. LLVM doesn't provide the transform you want. As Chris
> mentioned, if you open a