search for: 1bob

...end, %if.then %2 = landingpad { i8*, i32 } personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0 to i8*) cleanup %3 = extractvalue { i8*, i32 } %2, 0 store i8* %3, i8** %exn.slot %4 = extractvalue { i8*, i32 } %2, 1 store i32 %4, i32* %ehselector.slot call void @"\01??1Bob@@QEAA at XZ"(%class.Bob* %bob) #3 ; Calling the destructor for a class named “Bob” br label %eh.resume Replacing __gxx_personality_v0 with the name of my custom personality function (which has the SEH signature) and scrubbing out the terminate and resume calls for the time being, I see my...

...st (i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0 to i8*) > > cleanup > > %3 = extractvalue { i8*, i32 } %2, 0 > > store i8* %3, i8** %exn.slot > > %4 = extractvalue { i8*, i32 } %2, 1 > > store i32 %4, i32* %ehselector.slot > > call void @"\01??1Bob@@QEAA at XZ"(%class.Bob* %bob) #3 ; Calling the destructor for a class named “Bob” > > br label %eh.resume > > > > Replacing __gxx_personality_v0 with the name of my custom personality function (which has the SEH signature) and scrubbing out the terminate and resume c...

Thanks for the additional information. Right now I’m experimenting with a mix of code compiled with MSVC and code compiled with clang, trying to get a C++ exception thrown and caught by the MSVC-compiled code across a function in the clang-compiled code. My goal here is to isolate a small part of what needs to be done in a way that lends itself to tinkering. I think this might lead me to the