Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "1_53_0".
2013 May 14
0
[LLVMdev] CommandLine: using cl::Positional with enum
...39;t wait for me
> to do that.
>
Ok, ok, but, if you end up fixing this, please keep me post.
> If you are really desperate to have the command line options in the
> way you want they you may need to implement it yourself or use another
> library (e.g.http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/doc/html/program_options.html [ http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/doc/html/program_options.html ]
> ).
>
> Personally I think it's more important your tool does something rather
> than spending time worrying about how it's command line interface
> looks, so I would person...
2017 Dec 12
2
Extending llvm::iterator_range
Hello,
Our llvm::iterator_range is quite minimalist in design, it does not even
have an "empty" method.
Is that because we want it to work on all iterators (including those dirty
OutputIterator)?
Maybe we can add a little bit to it?
I recently needed:
- bool empty()
- value_type& font()
- value_type& back()
- void advance_begin(difference_type n)
- void
2013 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] CommandLine: using cl::Positional with enum
...VM CommandLine library but is
going to be a long time before I can look at it. So don't wait for me
to do that.
If you are really desperate to have the command line options in the
way you want they you may need to implement it yourself or use another
library (e.g. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/doc/html/program_options.html
).
Personally I think it's more important your tool does something rather
than spending time worrying about how it's command line interface
looks, so I would personally just implement everything as an optional
argument and then after parsing check yourself tha...