Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "19e9".
Did you mean:
19.9
2010 Feb 05
1
maximum elements in an ff object?
...th of an ff object" needing to be smaller than
.Machine$integer.max. Does anyone know if this means that the # of
elements in an ff object must be < .Machine$integer.max [i.e., that ff
provides no help with respect to the number of elements in a given
object]? I've got a matrix that has 19e9 elements and - even though I
can fit it into my ram (using "raw" storage.mode) - R won't let me
store it because 19e9 is >> .Machine$integer.max = 2^31.
Anyone else have suggestions on how to deal with such massive datasets
like the ones I'm using? I'm exploring ncdf as...
2008 Jun 13
0
rspec-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 20
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:47:22 -0500
> From: David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [rspec-users] rspec and rspec-rails install hell
> To: rspec-users <rspec-users at rubyforge.org>
> Message-ID: <EFE63242-19E9-42C5-AACD-16E239A9023B at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> On Jun 13, 2008, at 11:27 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>> Here is the problem. If RSpec gem is installed then I get the
>> rspec-rails / rspec version mismatch...