search for: 1963dcf3

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > >> > I'm fine with this as long as llvm-dwarfdump gets maintained. > >> > > >> > >> I agree, and as I said in the original email, in the long term I > >> believe llvm-dwarfdump is the correct solution. > >> > > > > The problem is that if

>> > I'm fine with this as long as llvm-dwarfdump gets maintained. >> > >> >> I agree, and as I said in the original email, in the long term I >> believe llvm-dwarfdump is the correct solution. >> > > The problem is that if no one is working on testing these sorts of things > with llvm-dwarfdump then it won't be maintained for this