search for: 193

Hi all, I still have problems with the predict function by setting up the values on which I want to predict ie: original df: p1 (193 obs) variates y x1 x2 rm(list=ls()) x1<-rnorm(193) x2<-runif(193,-5,5) y<-rnorm(193)+x1+x2 p1<-as.data.frame(cbind(y,x1,x2)) p1 y x1 x2 1 -0.6056448 -0.1113607 -0.5859728 2 -4.2841793 -1.0432688 -3.3116807 ...... 192 -1.3228239 1.0263013 -2.7801324 193...

...ogLik   1498.871 1558.059 -731.4353 Random effects:  Formula: ~1 | unit         (Intercept) Residual StdDev:    5.837025 7.104742 Fixed effects: y ~ Region * (x1 + x2 + x3)                                     Value Std.Error  DF   t-value p-value (Intercept)                     162.28206 22.340090 193  7.264163  0.0000 Regionb                  -11.06624 24.582841   5 -0.450161  0.6714 Regionc                 5.01670 29.177730   5  0.171936  0.8702 Regiond                  -36.63434 26.262448   5 -1.394932  0.2218 x1                     0.04091  0.034732 193  1.177953  0.2403 x2                  ...

Dear users I have received an output from one of the functions of igraph. The output is in the following form [[1]] [1] 1 196 94 89 92 197 0 [[2]] [1] 1 [[3]] [1] 1 196 97 193 4 [[4]] [1] 1 194 97 193 4 [[5]] [1] 1 194 97 193 4 6 [[6]] [1] 1 196 97 193 4 6 [[7]] [1] 1 196 97 193 4 185 7 [[8]] [1] 1 194 97 193 4 185 7 [[9]] [1] 1 196 97 193 188 185 7 [[10]] [1] 1 194 97 193 188 185 7 However I can not figure out how to...

...ly the voice only seems to be getting shaped one way when making external calls. For example I have the rules below (these are the matching rules only not the actual policy rules): #Create Chain for local traffic (outbound) /sbin/iptables -t mangle -A match-all -m physdev --physdev-in eth0 -s 193.xxx.xxx.66 -d 193.xxx.xxx.69 -j MARK --set-mark 0x44444445 /sbin/iptables -t mangle -A match-all -m physdev --physdev-in eth0 -s 193.xxx.xxx.66 -d 193.xxx.xxx.69 -j RETURN /sbin/iptables -t mangle -A match-all -m physdev --physdev-in eth0 -s 193.xxx.xxx.69 -d 193.xxx.xxx.66 -j MARK --set-mark 0x4...

Hi i am trying to do the same thing: receive a call from a cisco callmanager and forward it to a SIP user. Asterisk is compiled with h323 support, and is configured as a gateway in the cisco callmanager. h323.conf: [general] port = 1720 bindaddr = 193.x.x.x ; this SHALL contain a single, valid IP address for this machine allow=all extension.conf: exten = 3298,1,Answer exten = 3298,2,Dial(SIP/user@193.y.y.y) If a make a call to callamanager CISCO that forward to 3298 i read in asterisk console: Log: Verbosity is at least 20 -- Execu...

...arwal <arushi987 at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hi, >> Is it correct to convert, >>   %196 = load i32* %195, align 8                  ; <i32> [#uses=1] >>   %197 = zext i32 %196 to i64                     ; <i64> [#uses=1] >>   %198 = ptrtoint i8* %193 to i64                 ; <i64> [#uses=1] >>   %199 = add i64 %198, %197                       ; <i64> [#uses=1] >>   %200 = inttoptr i64 %199 to i8*                 ; <i8*> [#uses=1] >> into >> %200 = getelementptr %193, %196 >> Reducing the unnecessa...

...gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is it correct to convert, >>> %196 = load i32* %195, align 8 ;<i32> [#uses=1] >>> %197 = zext i32 %196 to i64 ;<i64> [#uses=1] >>> %198 = ptrtoint i8* %193 to i64 ;<i64> [#uses=1] >>> %199 = add i64 %198, %197 ;<i64> [#uses=1] >>> %200 = inttoptr i64 %199 to i8* ;<i8*> [#uses=1] >>> into >>> %200 = getelementptr %193, %196 >>>...

Hi wondering if anyone can help. I have two NICs on a debian sarge based system and current running as a bridge (br0) which consists of eth0 and eth1. Is it possible to add a virtual interface to the eth1 so I can also do NAT on the box as well? I have tried many times and keep coming up with errors. Kind Regards William Bohannan

...upport it. 2004-07-26 16:23:15: DEBUG2: cfparse.y:1429:cfparse(): parse successed. 2004-07-26 16:23:15: INFO: isakmp.c:1368:isakmp_open(): 1.1.1.1[500] used as isakmp port (fd=5) 2004-07-26 16:23:15: DEBUG: pfkey.c:197:pfkey_handler(): get pfkey X_SPDDUMP message 2004-07-26 16:23:15: DEBUG2: plog.c:193:plogdump(): 02120000 0f000100 01000000 0f020000 03000500 04180000 10020000 0a000300 00000000 00000000 03000600 04180000 10020000 0a000100 00000000 00000000 07001200 02000100 02000000 00000000 28003200 02020000 10020000 43203c92 00000000 00000000 10020000 43203c36 00000000 00000000 2004-07-26 16:23...

Hi all, Assume that I have the following 10 data points. x=c( 46, 125 , 36 ,193, 209, 78, 66, 242 , 297 , 45) sort x and get the following y= (36 , 45 , 46, 66, 78, 125,193, 209, 242, 297) I want to group the sorted data point (y) into equal number of observation per group. In this case there will be three groups. The first two groups will have three observation...

Hey All, Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now? Last time I tried that my system refused to boot. I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147 kernel to get my machine to reboot. Since that happened I've been watching this mail list for acknowledgement that the problem has been corrected while refusing the kernel upd...

...d remotely running CentOS 5.x. I need to have two IP's on the same interface. So I have this: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=69.x.x.199 HWADDR=00:x:x:x:c6:10 IPADDR=69.x.x.194 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 NETWORK=69.x.x.192 ONBOOT=yes GATEWAY=69.x.x.193 TYPE=Ethernet So I added this: /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=69.x.x.199 HWADDR=00:x:x:x:c6:10 IPADDR=69.x.x.195 NETMASK=255.255.255.248 NETWORK=69.x.x.192 ONBOOT=yes GATEWAY=69.x.x.193 TYPE=Ethernet Now the only IP that works is the second one....

All, I have a new box. Gigabyte motherboard AM2 sempron 3200+. CentOS installed fine, I rebooted after the install. It booted fine again. I ran yum -y update and now after that on boot it says Initializing hardware Storage network audio done Disabling IRQ #193 and then nothing. just sets there.... Any ideas on that??? Jerry

...>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Is it correct to convert, >>>>   %196 = load i32* %195, align 8                  ;<i32>  [#uses=1] >>>>   %197 = zext i32 %196 to i64                     ;<i64>  [#uses=1] >>>>   %198 = ptrtoint i8* %193 to i64                 ;<i64>  [#uses=1] >>>>   %199 = add i64 %198, %197                       ;<i64>  [#uses=1] >>>>   %200 = inttoptr i64 %199 to i8*                 ;<i8*>  [#uses=1] >>>> into >>>> %200 = getelementptr %193, %196...

At 07:11 AM 8/17/2020, you wrote: >On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now?? Last time I tried > > that my system refused to boot.? I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147 > > kernel to get my machine to reboot. > > > > Since that happened I've been watching this mail list for > > acknowledgement that the problem h...

...de <sys/select.h> it gets rid of: connection.c:192: `fd_set' undeclared (first use in this function) connection.c:192: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once connection.c:192: for each function it appears in.) connection.c:192: parse error before "rfds" connection.c:193: storage size of `tv' isn't known connection.c:209: warning: implicit declaration of function `FD_ZERO' connection.c:209: `rfds' undeclared (first use in this function) connection.c:213: warning: implicit declaration of function `FD_SET' connection.c:223: warning: implicit decla...

...+ i_1 + ... i_n, does it mean we can take either p_j as a base pointer, and other int variables its offset, say we take p_2 as the base pointer, and the p from i points to p_2 + (i_0 + i_1 + i_3 + .. i_n) ? So in the transformation example, the result is different when we take %196 or %193 as a base pointer. For alias-analysis, we may say the p can point to a memory any of the p_j points to. But if we consider memory safety, should we say p is safe to access if p is not out-of-bound no matter which p_j is taken as a base pointer? Could anyone explain this rule more precisely? For ex...

Hi, Is it correct to convert, %196 = load i32* %195, align 8 ; <i32> [#uses=1] %197 = zext i32 %196 to i64 ; <i64> [#uses=1] %198 = ptrtoint i8* %193 to i64 ; <i64> [#uses=1] %199 = add i64 %198, %197 ; <i64> [#uses=1] %200 = inttoptr i64 %199 to i8* ; <i8*> [#uses=1] into %200 = getelementptr %193, %196 Reducing the unnecessary casts of converting to integers and the...

On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Hey All, > > Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now?? Last time I tried > that my system refused to boot.? I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147 > kernel to get my machine to reboot. > > Since that happened I've been watching this mail list for > acknowledgement that the problem has been corrected while re...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193 Summary: sshd: error: select: Bad file number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: SunOS Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-...