Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "19248dd".
Did you mean:
19248
2016 Oct 25
0
[GIT PULL v2 4/5] processor.h: Remove cpu_relax_lowlatency users
...lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
return true;
- cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+ cpu_relax();
/*
* Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
index 19248dd..cc3ed0c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qrwlock.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static __always_inline void
rspin_until_writer_unlock(struct qrwlock *lock, u32 cnts)
{
while ((cnts & _QW_WMASK) == _QW_LOCKED) {
- cpu_relax_lowlatency();
+ cpu_relax();
cnts = atomic_read...
2016 Oct 25
7
[GIT PULL v2 0/5] cpu_relax: drop lowlatency, introduce yield
Peter,
here is v2 with some improved patch descriptions and some fixes. The
previous version has survived one day of linux-next and I only changed
small parts.
So unless there is some other issue, feel free to pull (or to apply
the patches) to tip/locking.
The following changes since commit 07d9a380680d1c0eb51ef87ff2eab5c994949e69:
Linux 4.9-rc2 (2016-10-23 17:10:14 -0700)
are available in
2016 Oct 25
7
[GIT PULL v2 0/5] cpu_relax: drop lowlatency, introduce yield
Peter,
here is v2 with some improved patch descriptions and some fixes. The
previous version has survived one day of linux-next and I only changed
small parts.
So unless there is some other issue, feel free to pull (or to apply
the patches) to tip/locking.
The following changes since commit 07d9a380680d1c0eb51ef87ff2eab5c994949e69:
Linux 4.9-rc2 (2016-10-23 17:10:14 -0700)
are available in