search for: 192

Oct ?3 11:52:41 tc_201_62 kernel: (ocfs2cmt,22737,__th_it__th__threit_cache:192 ERROR: status = __thre_thre_th_th_threa_t__t_th_th__thread:17 97 ERROR: status = -5 Oct ?3 11:52:41 tc_201_62 kernel: (ocfs2cm__th_t_th_t__th____th__thread:1797 ERROR: status = -5 Oct ?3 11:52:41 tc_201_62 kernel: (oc__thread:1797 ERROR: status = -5 Oct ?3 11:52:41 tc_201_62 kernel: (ocfs2___t_th_t...

...112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 However, the output should look like this: 0...

...INE-----901835-----Closer-----park----------999-----1-----TESTCAMP") in new stack -- Launched AGI Script /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin/agi-VDAD_ALL_inbound.agi == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/manager.conf': Found == Manager 'sendcron' logged on from 127.0.0.1 -- Executing AGI("Local/192*168*000*002*78600051 at default-230b,2", "agi:// 127.0.0.1:4577/call_log") in new stack -- AGI Script agi://127.0.0.1:4577/call_log completed, returning 0 -- Executing Dial("Local/192*168*000*002*78600051 at default-230b,2", "SIP/192*168*000*002*78600051 at sip64||tTor...

...1000baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 1000Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: Twisted Pair PHYAD: 0 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Link detected: yes ------------ TCP DUMP ---------------- 22:49:55.710260 IP 192.168.10.15.49392 > 192.168.10.12.139: . 86804678:86806126(1448) ack 76433 win 65535 <nop,nop,timestamp 232463412 17073752> NBT Packet 22:49:55.711544 IP 192.168.10.12.139 > 192.168.10.15.49392: . ack 86866186 win 17965 <nop,nop,timestamp 17073755 232463412> 22:49:55.712439 IP 192.1...

> Try > > ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 Thanks for the response. I tried. However, It did not resolve.... # ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 PING 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8(2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8) from fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a eth1: 56 data bytes On 2015/11/13 2:22, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Thu, 12 Nov 20...

...112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 128 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 > > It looks like the addressing in as1....

Hello, I have set up IPA on a private network and have hit some bumps configuring sudo access for the clients. kinit seems to work fine for both client and server, user and root. When I run sudo on the server I see the following in /var/log/messages: Oct 17 17:53:52 192-168-0-100 [sssd[krb5_child[29237]]]: Decrypt integrity check failed Oct 17 17:53:52 192-168-0-100 [sssd[krb5_child[29237]]]: Decrypt integrity check failed Thanks, Andrew ## I see the following in my clients /var/log/messages after starting sssd on the client. Oct 17 17:35:46 zabbix sssd: Start...

Hi all, I'm trying to figure out a weird bug I'm seeing. I'm hoping it's something simple in my IR but I can't see anything wrong so I'm hoping someone here can see something. I'm using LLVM to compile Java bytecode into native functions. My code keeps track of the Java local variables in an array of llvm::Value pointers which get phi'd up at various points. The

...nfig, it did not have a Link-Local Address. At link down, Is the Link-Local Address not set? Leave the link down, Is there a way to avoid this? # ethtool eth1 Settings for eth1: ? Link detected: no # ifconfig eth1 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:83:74:54 inet addr:192.168.11.8 Bcast:192.168.11.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8/64 Scope:Global UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:786 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:289 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0...

..., npopmax=20, spatial = F, nit=100000, thinnin=100, path.mcmc="./") >PostProcessChain(path.mcmc="./", nxdom=100, nydom=100, burnin=200) I have an 8 cores computer, and since I have to compute that bit on a thousand of line like that : 209 209 217 217 180 180 154 154 181 181 192 192 -9 -9 211 211 -9 -9 160 160 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 254 254 140 140 181 181 -9 -9 -9 -9 211 211 158 158 160 160 158 146 209 209 223 223 348 348 186 186 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 -9 154 154 146 146 212 212 291 291 218 218 170 170 187 187 194 194 190 190 214 208 152 152 158 158 155 155 209 209 -9 -9 1...

...in This is my scenario: I have a *user A* who has registered with sip server(ONDO), I made asterisk to register as a sip client with ONDO, I want to make a call to user A from an extension. My configurations sip.config [general] context=default register => raja:adsi6677@*192.xxx.xxx.xxx*/1234 bindport=5060 ; UDP Port to bind to (SIP standard port is 5060) bindaddr=0.0.0.0 ; IP address to bind to ( 0.0.0.0 binds to all) srvlookup=yes ; Enable DNS SRV lookups on outbound calls [authentication] auth=raja:adsi6677@*192.xxx.xxx.xxx* [*192.xxx.xxx.xxx*...

...nswered. (call2) is then transferred to (exten2) using the "Xfer" button on the snom phone. This results in dropping both calls. I've attached a sanitized sip trace from the snom phone for your perusal. Thanks for any help you can offer. Brian ### START SIP TRACE ### Sent to udp:192.168.0.129:5060 at 14/12/2004 18:21:29:500 (593 bytes): REGISTER sip:192.168.0.129 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.102.70:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-wg4ok3zkt573;rport From: "snom_01" <sip:snom_01@192.168.0.129>;tag=i7u8p4i1vi To: "snom_01" <sip:snom_01@192.168.0.129> Call...

...: numerical expression has 76 elements: only the first used > numer [1] 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 >> e2 <- -(beta)*Z[ iZ[i:n] ] Warning message: In i:n : numerical expression has 76 elements: only the first used > e2 [1] -442 -1664 -442 -1792 -476 -1792 -476 -1792 -510 -1920 -510 -1920 [13] -510 -1920 -510 -1920 -510 -1920 -510 -2048 -544 -2048 -544 -2048 [25] -544 -2048 -544 -2048 -544 -2048 -544 -2048 -544 -2048 -578 -2176 [37] -578 -2176 -578 -2176 -578 -2176 -578 -2176 -578 -2176 -578 -2176 [49] -578 -2176 -578 -2176 -578 -2304 -612 -2304 -...

...t;> > > Not exactly sure how routing works with aliases on the same interface > but the first thing I would try is the same as you would use on > different interfaces. That is, leave the 'GATEWAY=' on your > internet-facing etho, but remove the entry from the private eth0:192. > Then add a route-eth0:192 file containing the network(s) and > gateway for the private side. The source address it picks should be > the one appropriate to reach the next-hop router specified in your > routes. > I created a file called /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-et...

...3== at 0x8110A0D: (within /usr/sbin/winbindd) ==25463== by 0x81110F6: (within /usr/sbin/winbindd) ==25463== by 0x81117D7: get_dc_list (in /usr/sbin/winbindd) ==25463== by 0x81114DF: get_sorted_dc_list (in /usr/sbin/winbindd) ==25463== Address 0x41D28E50 is 0 bytes after a block of size 192 alloc'd ==25463== at 0x4002986F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:160) ==25463== by 0x8110969: (within /usr/sbin/winbindd) ==25463== by 0x81110F6: (within /usr/sbin/winbindd) ==25463== by 0x81117D7: get_dc_list (in /usr/sbin/winbindd) ==25463== ==25463== Invalid write of size 4 ==25463=...

...sha224 sha256 sha3-224 sha3-256 sha3-384 sha3-512 sha384 sha512 sha512-224 sha512-256 shake128 shake256 sm3 Cipher commands (see the `enc' command for more details) aes-128-cbc aes-128-ecb aes-192-cbc aes-192-ecb aes-256-cbc aes-256-ecb aria-128-cbc aria-128-cfb aria-128-cfb1 aria-128-cfb8 aria-128-ctr aria-128-ecb aria-128-ofb aria-192-cbc aria-192-cfb aria-192-cfb1 aria-192-cfb8 aria-192-ctr aria-192-ecb aria-192-ofb aria-256...

...hat's enough output from the log. freecups# grep -A100 -B100 NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED log.smbd Checking operation #92 (type 92, layer 0) Making operation type 92 opaque [module /[Default VFS]/] Accepting operation type 92 from module /[Default VFS]/ [2010/09/29 17:31:53, 5] smbd/vfs.c:192(vfs_init_custom) Checking operation #93 (type 93, layer 0) Making operation type 93 opaque [module /[Default VFS]/] Accepting operation type 93 from module /[Default VFS]/ [2010/09/29 17:31:53, 5] smbd/vfs.c:192(vfs_init_custom) Checking operation #94 (type 94, layer 0) Making opera...

...> manually. If so, with what tools? Thanks for the response. I'm sorry when it was misguided answer. The setting of the IP address reaches by manual operation. # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 BOOTPROTO="none" ONBOOT=yes HWADDR=08:00:27:83:74:54 IPADDR=192.168.11.8 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 IPV6INIT=yes IPV6ADDR=2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8/64 IPV6_DEFAULTGW=2000:7000:12:6::1 ? link up # ethtool eth1 Settings for eth1: ? Link detected: yes # ifdown eth1 # ifup eth1 # ifconfig eth1 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 08:00:27:83:74:54...

Hey all. I've got working samba AD server with dlz backend. To avoid performance issues I'm using external DNS which forwards queries for the AD zone to the Samba server, like that: zone "myadzone.int" { > type forward; > forwarders { 192.xx.x.xx; }; > }; 192.xx.x.xx = my AD Samba. This way it works alright, but on the external DNS I'm getting errors like: > named[20356]: REFUSED unexpected RCODE resolving '_kerberos._ > udp.AD.INT/SRV/IN': 192.xx.x.xx #53 > named[20356]: REFUSED unexpected RCODE resolv...

My ctdb version is 4.17.7 Hello, everyone. My ctdb cluster configuration is correct and the cluster is healthy before operation. My cluster has three nodes, namely host-192-168-34-164, host-192-168-34-165, and host-192-168-34-166. And the node host-192-168-34-164 is the leader before operation. I conducted network oscillation testing on node host-192-168-34-164?I down the interface of private network of ctdb at 19:18:54.091439. Then this node starts to do recovery....