search for: 19120

...[[2]] [1] 0 1 2 18 22 > mm 1 4 7 10 12 14 19 22 1 00000 18128 18576 20048 19408 21472 16528 20432 4 20080 00000 20576 23520 19776 19504 21312 22384 7 21072 25456 00000 18448 19152 22144 18368 19280 10 18624 22880 16256 00000 17856 16032 17008 19120 12 20208 15712 17008 23264 00000 23168 19872 24000 14 26560 19024 20704 19520 20048 00000 16736 21056 19 17600 22640 20704 17200 17312 17728 00000 18912 22 18128 19024 21120 17296 20208 19904 21120 00000 > example 1 1 4 7 10 12 14 19 22 1 00000...

Hi to all, i have dovecot 2.2.5 when i digit doveadm who i see a lot of connections IMAP for single user liker the example below xxxxx.yyyyyy at mail.cgilfe.it 9 imap (20572 20614 19120 20653 19136 20655 19138 20661 20471) (192.168.x.xxx) Why so many IMAP? -- *Davide Marchi* *T*eorema *F*errara *Srl* Via Spronello, 7 - Ferrara - 44121 Tel. *0532783161* Fax. *0532783368* E-m at il: *davide.marchi at mail.cgilfe.it* Skype: *davide.marchi73* Web: *http://www.cgilfe.it* *CONFIDEN...

...nnect the ssh session, the path /run/user/1000/keyring-wpPOO8/gpg-fwd is not deleted. lsof doesn't show any processes with the file open. When I re-execute the same ssh command above, the domain socket forwarding fails, with the following showing up in sshd's log: Nov 6 23:25:12 dart sshd[19120]: error: bind: Address already in use Nov 6 23:25:12 dart sshd[19120]: error: unix_listener: cannot bind to path: /run/user/1000/keyring-wpPOO8/gpg-fwd If I rm the domain socket manually on the server, then forwarding with that remote name works again, once, until I delete it again, etc. -- You...

Is there support for scrolling with a mouse like in Google Maps? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...560 Header offset/logical size: 81920/42496000 Number of records: 806 Incompatible hash: yes Active/supported feature flags: 0x00000001/0x00000001 Robust mutexes locking: yes Smallest/average/largest keys: 24/24/24 Smallest/average/largest data: 304/503/2080 Smallest/average/largest padding: 4/1528/19120 Number of dead records: 11146 Smallest/average/largest dead records: 416/2688/21816 Number of free records: 4049 Smallest/average/largest free records: 12/2579/6959332 Number of hash chains: 10007 Smallest/average/largest hash chains: 0/1/5 Number of uncoalesced records: 3473 Smallest/average/large...

Upgraded to Samba 4.11.2 and I?ve now too started seeing the message: get_share_mode_lock: get_static_share_mode_data failed: NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY A lot. I modified the source in source3/locking/share_mode_lock.c a bit in order to print out the values of the service path, smb_fname & old_write_time when it fails and it seems they are all NULL? [2019/11/14 14:24:23.358441, 0]

Hi Guys, My users are reporting some issues with memory on our lustre 1.8.1 clients. It looks like when they submit a single job at a time the run time was about 4.5 minutes. However, when they ran multiple jobs (10 or less) on a client with 192GB of memory on a single node the run time for each job was exceeding 3-4X the run time for the single process. They also noticed that the swap space