Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "190k".
Did you mean:
10k
2003 Feb 12
2
Syncing large amounts of data
I need some suggestions. Here's my setup:
800GB of Data
14,000,000+ Files
No changes just additions
Files range in size from 30k - 190k
The files are laid out in a tree fashion like:
BASE
\-Directory ( Numerical Directory name from 0 - 1023 )
\-Directory ( Numerical Directory name from 0 - 1023 )
\- Files ( Up to 1024 files each directory )
This allows for a maximum of about a billion files. I need to limit the
a...
2002 Aug 05
1
Question on FW and htb
...[root@localhost tc]# iptables -L -n -v -t mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 489K packets, 285M
bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
3799 454K MARK all -- * *
0.0.0.0/0 10.0.0.0/8 MARK set 0x1
190K 12M MARK all -- * *
10.0.0.0/8 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x1
0 0 MARK all -- * *
0.0.0.0/0 192.168.1.224/29 MARK set 0x2
0 0 MARK all -- * *
192.168.1.224/29 0.0.0.0/0 MARK set 0x2
P...
2003 Jan 23
4
SIMD instructions
Vorbis does not appear to use any SIMD instructions.
A short look around in the source code indicates that it would be
possible and might even yield big performance improvements. Why has
nobody done it yet?
I am currently trying to learn using these instructions and would be
willing to rewrite a few functions in SIMD instructions, if I understand
how to vectorize them and if they make a
2007 Dec 12
0
Degraded zpool won''t online disk device, instead resilvers spare
...22 5.79M 151K
|----c4t36d0 - - 93 22 4.76M 151K
|----spare - - 0 137 0 5.95M
|------c5t29d0 - - 0 0 0 0
|------c5t21d0 - - 0 136 0 5.95M
|----c4t37d0 - - 74 23 3.86M 190K
------------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
So notice that there is 0 disk traffic for the disk we are trying to bring online (c5t29d0), but there is write disk traffic for the spare disk AND the other spare disk. So it looks like it''s resilvering both mirror disks again? (why...
2017 Oct 04
2
Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7
...ages here
> https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/ and
Index of /centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10<https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/>
buildlogs.centos.org
Parent Directory - gdeploy-2.0.2-14.el7.noarch.rpm: 2017-09-05 11:40 : 190K : glusterfs-3.10.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: 2017-02-24 18:10 : 525K : glusterfs-3.10.1-1.el7.x86 ...
> then, we push the package to the server and install them via rpm
> command .
>
> Do you think this is a correct way to upgrade gluster when working
> without internet access?
Yes, you...
2017 Oct 05
0
Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7
...gs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/ and
>
> Index of /centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10
> <https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/>
> buildlogs.centos.org
> Parent Directory - gdeploy-2.0.2-14.el7.noarch.rpm: 2017-09-05 11:40 :
> 190K : glusterfs-3.10.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: 2017-02-24 18:10 : 525K :
> glusterfs-3.10.1-1.el7.x86 ...
>
>
>
> > then, we push the package to the server and install them via rpm
> > command .
> >
> > Do you think this is a correct way to upgrade gluster when working
&g...
2017 Oct 05
2
Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7
...ntos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/ and
Index of /centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10<https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/>
buildlogs.centos.org<http://buildlogs.centos.org>
Parent Directory - gdeploy-2.0.2-14.el7.noarch.rpm: 2017-09-05 11:40 : 190K : glusterfs-3.10.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: 2017-02-24 18:10 : 525K : glusterfs-3.10.1-1.el7.x86 ...
> then, we push the package to the server and install them via rpm
> command .
>
> Do you think this is a correct way to upgrade gluster when working
> without internet access?
Yes, you...
2017 Oct 05
0
Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7
...torage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/ and
>>
>> Index of /centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10
>> <https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/>
>> buildlogs.centos.org
>> Parent Directory - gdeploy-2.0.2-14.el7.noarch.rpm: 2017-09-05 11:40 :
>> 190K : glusterfs-3.10.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: 2017-02-24 18:10 : 525K :
>> glusterfs-3.10.1-1.el7.x86 ...
>>
>>
>>
>> > then, we push the package to the server and install them via rpm
>> > command .
>> >
>> > Do you think this is a correct way to...
2006 Feb 24
17
Re: [nfs-discuss] bug 6344186
Joseph Little wrote:
> I''d love to "vote" to have this addressed, but apparently votes for
> bugs are no available to outsiders.
>
> What''s limiting Stanford EE''s move to using ZFS entirely for our
> snapshoting filesystems and multi-tier storage is the inability to
> access .zfs directories and snapshots in particular on NFSv3 clients.
2017 Oct 04
0
Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7
On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:17:23PM +0000, ismael mondiu wrote:
>
> Thanks Niels,
>
> We want to install it on redhat 7. We work on a secured environment
> with no internet access.
>
> We download the packages here
> https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/ and
> then, we push the package to the server and install them via rpm
> command .
2006 Apr 09
3
Conntrack, nat and multipath - what is wrong here?
...0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
tcp spt:25 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `mangle/OUTPUT:''
0 0 LOG tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
tcp dpt:25 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `mangle/OUTPUT:''
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 190K packets, 165M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
0 0 LOG tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
tcp spt:25 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `mangle/POSTROUTING:''
0 0 LOG tcp -- *...
2017 Oct 04
2
Glusterd not working with systemd in redhat 7
Thanks Niels,
We want to install it on redhat 7. We work on a secured environment with no internet access.
We download the packages here https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.10/ and then, we push the package to the server and install them via rpm command .
Do you think this is a correct way to upgrade gluster when working without internet access?
Thanks in advance
2006 May 19
25
iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in
the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I
match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this
does not seem to work:
wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source