search for: 188k

On 02/13/2018 at 08:41 AM Floimair Florian wrote: > No you're reading it wrong. > > There are 188K received with no loss, and 16441K transmitted. This doesn't make any sense to me, either. There can't be more packages transmitted than received. It's the same codec in and out and it's been running exactly the same time. > ...........Receive......... .........Transmit............

Hi Carsten, On 02/11/2018 at 07:46 PM Carsten Bock wrote: > Hi, > > Lost percent (%).... Are you sure? I'm seeing here: ...........Receive......... .........Transmit.......... Count Lost Pct Jitter Count Lost Pct Jitter RTT.... 188K 0 0 0.000 188K 16641K 8809 0.000 0.026 => This doesn't sound reliable to me: there are 188K packets and 16641K of them are lost?! The Pct value is fluctuating between about 6009 and 9009. Thanks, Michael > > > Am 11.02.2018 19:27 schrieb "Michael Maier&...

...4 but expecting 10106 (time since last read = 0ms), dropped 5838 packets On 02/13/2018 01:24 PM, Andres wrote: > On 2/13/18 11:55 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >> On 02/13/2018 at 08:41 AM Floimair Florian wrote: >>> No you're reading it wrong. >>> >>> There are 188K received with no loss, and 16441K transmitted. >> This doesn't make any sense to me, either. There can't be more packages >> transmitted than received. It's the same codec in and out and it's been >> running exactly the same time. > Lost and Percent (pct) are no...

...see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/16005. I've finally got around to updating the backend to build against the svn trunk and got approval to contribute the code. Shall I just just submit the patch to the llvm-commits list? The current patch I have is rather large (188K), but I feel it would be difficult to split into incremental changes at this point. Richard Osborne | XMOS http://www.xmos.com

Hello, could somebody please tell me the meaning of "Pct" as seen in asterisk cli: ...........Receive......... .........Transmit.......... Count Lost Pct Jitter Count Lost Pct Jitter RTT.... Thanks, Michael

...y iozone. > > six nodes with stripe 6 and underlying EXT4 file system. > > The ext4 filesystems where not mounted with out the -o acl option. > I meant with out the -o acl option. > Any Ideas? > > in both cases it created a folder with no permissions. >> >>> 188K d--------- 2 root root 24K 2011-12-06 11:28 tmp/ >>> iozone$ rm -rf tmp >>> rm: cannot remove directory `tmp': Permission denied >>> test$ cd iozone.broke/ >>> iozone.broke$ ls >>> ./ ../ tmp/ >>> iozone.broke$ ls -lash >>> total 58...

...s `proc/3662/task/3662/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory du: cannot access `proc/3662/fd/4': No such file or directory du: cannot access `proc/3662/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory 14G var 1.8G usr 278M lib 77M boot 31M etc 27M lib64 15M sbin 7.8M bin 188K dev 112K root Why *df -h* is reporting 24G used? Where the space did go? How I can fix this?

...mmy device 80x25 Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Software IO TLB disabled vmalloc area: c9000000-f4ffe000, maxmem 2d7fe000 Memory: 118016k/139264k available (2071k kernel code, 12896k reserved, 1080k data, 188k init, 0k highmem) virtual kernel memory layout:     fixmap  : 0xf5315000 - 0xf57fe000   (5028 kB)     pkmap   : 0xf5000000 - 0xf5200000   (2048 kB)     vmalloc : 0xc9000000 - 0xf4ffe000   ( 703 MB)     lowmem  : 0xc0000000 - 0xc8800000   ( 136 MB)       .init : 0xc1319000 - 0xc1348000   ( 188 kB)  ...

...????????????????????????????????????????? Size? Used Avail Use% Mounted on rootfs?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 19G? 2.0G?? 16G? 11% / udev???????????????????????????????????????????????????? 10M???? 0?? 10M?? 0% /dev tmpfs?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 396M? 188K? 396M?? 1% /run /dev/disk/by-uuid/eda48b2a-5977-4651-a735-807ca9056802?? 19G? 2.0G?? 16G? 11% / tmpfs?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 5.0M???? 0? 5.0M?? 0% /run/lock tmpfs?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 967M???? 0? 967M?? 0% /run/shm /dev/sdb1???????????????????...

...my device 80x25 Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Software IO TLB disabled vmalloc area: dc000000-f4ffe000, maxmem 2d7fe000 Memory: 421504k/446464k available (2071k kernel code, 16420k reserved, 1080k data, 188k init, 0k highmem) virtual kernel memory layout: fixmap : 0xf5315000 - 0xf57fe000 (5028 kB) pkmap : 0xf5000000 - 0xf5200000 (2048 kB) vmalloc : 0xdc000000 - 0xf4ffe000 ( 399 MB) lowmem : 0xc0000000 - 0xdb400000 ( 436 MB) .init : 0xc1319000 - 0xc1348000 ( 188 kB)...

...993.322 MHz processor. Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Software IO TLB disabled vmalloc area: c5000000-fb7fe000, maxmem 34000000 Memory: 60684k/73728k available (2214k kernel code, 4708k reserved, 885k data, 188k init, 0k highmem) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Security Framework v1.0.0 initialized SELinux: Disabled at boot. Capability LSM initialized Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 256K Enabling fast FPU...

...-hsx /?, but then you don?t get the results you want. Instead, I?d recommend just explicitly listing the most likely pigs: /usr, /var, /home, and /etc. > 14G var > 1.8G usr > 278M lib > 77M boot > 31M etc > 27M lib64 > 15M sbin > 7.8M bin > 188K dev > 112K root I see about 16 GiB. > Why *df -h* is reporting 24G used? Where the space did go? How I can fix > this? 24 - 16 = 8, which sounds suspiciously like the size of a swap file. What does mount say?

...rch engine system. I''m trying to index a really big folder containing lots of files (18M), the disk size is ~220Gig. The files are quite small text files (mean size ~ 1K). The OS is latest leopard. I think the process is io-bound. 63061 recollinde 10.4% 3:58:06 1 15 486 435M 188K 435M 452M I''m using those 2 scripts found here: http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/howtoguides/dtracehowto.jsp#3 #!/usr/sbin/dtrace -qs BEGIN { printf("%10s %58s %2s\n", "DEVICE", "FILE", "RW"); } io:::start { printf("%10s %58s %2s\...

...port SrvDaemon File "/usr/lib64/python/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line 17, in ? import xen.lowlevel.xc ImportError: /usr/lib64/python/xen/lowlevel/xc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory However, root@dev4:/usr/lib64/python/xen/lowlevel# ls -lah total 188K drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4.0K 2006-09-27 01:20 . drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4.0K 2006-09-27 01:20 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 25K 2006-09-24 22:35 acm.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2 2006-09-24 22:01 __init__.py -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 122 2006-09-27 01:20 __init__.pyc -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 79K 2006-09-2...

Hi, Running Centos 5 (32bit)... running a server with 4gb of RAM and it's shows up as: [root at ubercore1 ~]# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 3369544 2549668 819876 0 29008 2382360 -/+ buffers/cache: 138300 3231244 Swap: 6291448 0 6291448 I know 4gb is the limit for a 32bit OS but i

playing with hdt on a soekris 4801, Im getting HUGE delays in cpu_detect. I added some timing code, heres what Im seeing ACPI: Detecting 0 mS in detect_acpi MEMORY: Detecting 0 mS in detect_memory DMI: Detecting Table DMI: ERROR ! Table not found ! DMI: Many hardware components will not be detected ! 55 mS in detect_dmi CPU: Detecting 0 mS in get_cpu_vendor 0 mS in "intel cpu

playing with hdt on a soekris 4801, Im getting HUGE delays in cpu_detect. I added some timing code, heres what Im seeing ACPI: Detecting 0 mS in detect_acpi MEMORY: Detecting 0 mS in detect_memory DMI: Detecting Table DMI: ERROR ! Table not found ! DMI: Many hardware components will not be detected ! 55 mS in detect_dmi CPU: Detecting 0 mS in get_cpu_vendor 0 mS in "intel cpu

....0.0/0 tcp spt:25 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `filter/OUTPUT:'' 0 0 LOG tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:25 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `filter/OUTPUT:'' eos ~ # iptables -t mangle -nvL Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 188K packets, 165M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 0 0 LOG tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp spt:25 LOG flags 0 level 4 prefix `mangle/PREROUTING:'' 0 0 LOG tcp -- * *...

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a

Hi strange behaviour of iptables on a centos 7.0 machine: The following rule is in the iptables of said machine: [root at myserver ~]# iptables -L -v -n --line-numbers |grep 175\. 9 9 456 DROP all -- * * 175.44.0.0/16 0.0.0.0/0 [root at myserver ~]# The corresponding enty in /etc/sysconfig/iptables looks like: [root at myserver ~]# grep 175 /etc/sysconfig/iptables