Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "185g".
Did you mean:
185
2019 Apr 20
3
Does devtmps and tmpfs use underlying hard disk storage or Physical Memory (RAM)
...fs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 817M 7.0G 11% /run
tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /run/user/995
tmpfs tmpfs 1.6G 0 1.6G 0% /run/user/1000
total - 185G 8.8G 176G 5% -
#
Does devtmpfs and tmpfs use underlying hard disk storage or does it uses
Physical Memory (RAM). What is the purpose of devtmpfs which is mounted on
/dev, tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm and so on and so forth. What is the
difference between devtmpfs and tmpfs?
I will appreciate if...
2016 Mar 16
2
overview zlib efficiency? Summary and added note
Hi,
use "doveadm" to get all real message
doveadm -f table fetch -A "size.physical" ALL | awk
'{s+=$2}END{printf("%.2fMB\n", s/1024/1024);}'
189247.67MB .. 185G
use "du" to get size on disc:
In my case
with deduplication:
/srv/stroage/# du -s -h *
53G vmail
75G vmail_sis
without deduplication
/srv/stroage/# du -s -h -l *
53G vmail
209G vmail_sis
j4i, SIS can't use the zlib plugin so the 75G in my case are not
compressed...
2007 Jul 31
0
controller number mismatch
...0.0 0.1 0.1 1.7 0 3 c1t12d0
$ zpool iostat -v 6
capacity operations bandwidth
pool used avail read write read write
----------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
zpool 930G 566G 16 114 41.5K 915K
raidz1 631G 185G 11 71 30.9K 573K
c3t0d0 - - 0 38 38.8K 120K
c3t1d0 - - 0 42 38.8K 115K
c3t2d0 - - 0 44 49.9K 120K
c3t3d0 - - 0 43 33.3K 115K
c3t4d0 - - 0 41 44.4K 1...
2012 Jun 23
3
How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2
Good day,
Please am new on CentOS, may you help me with the upgrade from 5.8 to
6.2 using?
Thanks a lot
--
--
You Truly
Eric Kom
System Administrator - Metropolitan College
_________________________________________
/ You are scrupulously honest, frank, and \
| straightforward. Therefore you have few |
\ friends. /
-----------------------------------------
2016 Mar 15
8
overview zlib efficiency?
Hi,
may be someone has already done that: Do you have a script(?) tool which
shows the efficiency of the mail compression if zlib is used?
Something that shows the uncompressed size vrs. the compressed.
Thanks for hints! /G?tz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5571 bytes
Desc: S/MIME
2015 Jun 24
8
rsyncing directories - sanity check
.../mapper/SysVG-HomeVol
4.0G 137M 3.7G 4% /home
/dev/mapper/SysVG-OptVol
6.0G 4.3G 1.4G 76% /opt
/dev/mapper/SysVG-TmpVol
2.0G 130M 1.8G 7% /tmp
/dev/mapper/SysVG-UsrVol
197G 2.8G 185G 2% /usr
/dev/mapper/SysVG-VarVol
6.0G 549M 5.1G 10% /var
Does anyone have a good guess as to why these 'out of space' failures are
occurring?
Thanks,
Tim
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B