Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "179735".
Did you mean:
17935
2004 Sep 10
2
Re: non-PIC code in shared libs again
...ic. As far as I understand, the final linking
> should always be done with the C++ compiler in this case.
Yes, unfortunately, the current release of libtool does not handle this
correctly.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=128391
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179735
etc.
--
- mdz
2004 Sep 10
0
Re: non-PIC code in shared libs again
...final linking
>> should always be done with the C++ compiler in this case.
>
> Yes, unfortunately, the current release of libtool does not handle this
> correctly.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=128391
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179735
>
Well, for now I have fixed it in the fink package like so:
--- flac-1.1.0/confgure.in.orig 2003-02-11 08:46:25.000000000 -0800
+++ flac-1.1.0/configure.in 2003-02-11 08:46:34.000000000 -0800
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
dnl There is some confusion over what libraries libid3 needs...
2004 Sep 10
4
non-PIC code in shared libs again
On Wednesday, February 5, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Josh Coalson wrote:
> --- Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
>
> good, very good. it may take me a little bit to get to it
> since I'm starting a new job next week.
>
> Ben, can you inspect the patch and confirm that it covers
> what you also suggested?
The patch fixed the problem with your libs. However, when