Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1788b621".
Did you mean:
1088621
2010 Jan 21
1
[LLVMdev] call graph not complete
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> Bitcode generated by llvm-ld with –disable-opt and –basiccg options is:
>>
>
> ...
>
>
>
>> My point is why is the call to foo not resolved correctly in llvm-ld.
>>
>
> Resolving an call to a direct call is an optimization. But you turned all
> optimizations off.
>
>
BTW, why do