search for: 17855

...on whether there is a huge basic block in the function is another idea, but I am not sure if that is possible (I don't think this is currently supported). This brings down the compilation time (using clang -emit-llvm) from 350s to 30s (it still takes about 23s to do GVN). It also might fix PR17855 (the program that used to take 65s to compile now takes just 11s): http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17855 2. Cache the ordering of loads and stores in LoadAndStorePromoter::run. I don't know how hard it would be to implement this, but I think it would be as fast as 1 (using mem2reg)....

...13551 13589 13806 13815 13818 13881 13883 13885 13980 14453 14578 14617 14618 14620 14666 14667 14668 14677 14685 14783 14790 14964 14966 14967 14972 15050 15436 15476 15949 15959 15964 15965 15971 16106 16110 16283 16284 16293 16310 16318 16331 16372 16373 16374 16785 16786 16787 16985 16987 17050 17855 17857 17871 17875 17876 17877 17959 17978 17979 18044 18807 18814 18821 18822 18823 18917 18918 18936 19005 19121 19291 19292 20058 20372 20467 20468 20469 20475 20489 20510 20516 20521 20522 20523 20524 20541 20560 20562 20582 20584 20653 20654 20904 21532 21595 21596 21716 21717 21719 21724 21725...

...es/LLVMgold.dir/build.make:65: recipe for target 'tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/gold-plugin.cpp.o' failed > make[3]: *** [tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/gold-plugin.cpp.o] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/jshi19/llvm38releasebuild' > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:17855: recipe for target 'tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/all' failed > make[2]: *** [tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/all] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/jshi19/llvm38releasebuild' > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:17867: recipe for target 'tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMg...

Hi Thomas, That's very interesting. Below is my search result. Any idea why is my result so slow:- Appreciate if you could advise. Thanks Kevin . OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE

...s/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/build.make:65: recipe for target 'tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/gold-plugin.cpp.o' failed make[3]: *** [tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/gold-plugin.cpp.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/jshi19/llvm38releasebuild' CMakeFiles/Makefile2:17855: recipe for target 'tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/all' failed make[2]: *** [tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/jshi19/llvm38releasebuild' CMakeFiles/Makefile2:17867: recipe for target 'tools/gold/CMakeFiles/LLVMgold.dir/rule...

Hey all, I need to launce a rather lengthy process from a small Rails application. It''s the sort of thing (sending out an email newsletter) that would need to be launched from a browser window, but the browser doesn''t need to stick around to see it through. I played around with Thread.new, but I think, based on limited testing, that the threads need to complete before the view

...2VPPFOxv4t>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: UID 17854: Opened mail because: prefetch Oct 18 13:39:37 imap(XXXX)<7552><ebbmyS2VPPFOxv4t>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: UID 17854: Opened mail because: full mail Oct 18 13:39:37 imap(XXXX)<7552><ebbmyS2VPPFOxv4t>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: UID 17855: Opened mail because: prefetch Oct 18 13:39:37 imap(XXXX)<7552><ebbmyS2VPPFOxv4t>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: UID 17855: Opened mail because: full mail Oct 18 13:39:37 imap(XXXX)<7552><ebbmyS2VPPFOxv4t>: Debug: Mailbox INBOX: UID 17856: Opened mail because: prefetch Oct 18 13:3...

...815 13818 13881 13883 13885 > 13980 14453 14578 14617 14618 14620 14666 14667 14668 14677 14685 14783 > 14790 14964 14966 14967 14972 15050 15436 15476 15949 15959 15964 15965 > 15971 16106 16110 16283 16284 16293 16310 16318 16331 16372 16373 16374 > 16785 16786 16787 16985 16987 17050 17855 17857 17871 17875 17876 17877 > 17959 17978 17979 18044 18807 18814 18821 18822 18823 18917 18918 18936 > 19005 19121 19291 19292 20058 20372 20467 20468 20469 20475 20489 20510 > 20516 20521 20522 20523 20524 20541 20560 20562 20582 20584 20653 20654 > 20904 21532 21595 21596 21716 217...

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz.sig Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Changes + Added mail_delivery_started and mail_delivery_finished events, see https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/list_of_events/ for details. + dsync-replication: Don't replicate users who have "noreplicate" extra field in

https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.8.tar.gz.sig Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/ Changes + Added mail_delivery_started and mail_delivery_finished events, see https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/list_of_events/ for details. + dsync-replication: Don't replicate users who have "noreplicate" extra field in

Hi Steven, > On May 29, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Mehdi, > Should I apply your attached patch on my llvm3.8 source firstly? Or should I use the latest llvm SVN trunk instead? I wrote it on trunk, but I expect it to be fairly easy to port on 3.8. This is really just quickly plumbing an option on the TargetMachine creation. --

...asic block in the function > is another idea, but I am not sure if that is possible (I don't think this > is currently supported). > > > This brings down the compilation time (using clang -emit-llvm) from 350s > to 30s (it still takes about 23s to do GVN). It also might fix PR17855 (the > program that used to take 65s to compile now takes just 11s): > > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17855 > > Chandler commented here, I'll defer to him. > > > 2. Cache the ordering of loads and stores in LoadAndStorePromoter::run. > I don't know...

> On May 29, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Shi, Steven <steven.shi at intel.com> wrote: > > (And I doubt the GNU linker supports LTO with LLVM). > [Steven]: I’ve pushed GNU Binutils ld to support LLVM gold plugin, see detail in this bug https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20070 <https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20070>. The new GNU ld linker works well with