search for: 1781

Hi All, I am using CentOS 5.5 with gcc version 2.5.123.el5. I just wanted to check whether the CVE-2015-1781 is fixed in the current version? How can I do that? Right now I dont have access to that machine, so I wanted to check whether its fixed online ( not via shell)? Thanks for the help. -- Thanks & Regards, Venkateswara Rao Dokku.

hii guys: i get the message from the asterisk: Started music on hold, class 'default', on Local/s at skype-web-callback-dial-263to263-1775,1 [2008-11-11 14:32:41] WARNING[1781]: format_wav.c:156 check_header: Unexpected freqency 11025 [2008-11-11 14:32:41] WARNING[1781]: file.c:322 fn_wrapper: Unable to open format wav [2008-11-11 14:32:41] WARNING[1781]: res_musiconhold.c:259 ast_moh_files_next: Unable to open file '/data/TOMSKYPEIVR/var/lib/asterisk/moh/callback1...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781 Bug ID: 1781 Summary: Optimisation fails for raw payload expressions in a valid ruleset Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1781 Summary: Document how to use Solaris 10 /dev/random Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Documentation Assig...

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku <dvrao.584 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am using CentOS 5.5 with gcc version 2.5.123.el5. Are you really on 5.5? You should consider updating to 5.11. > I just wanted to check whether the CVE-2015-1781 is fixed in the current > version? > > How can I do that? > > > Right now I dont have access to that machine, so I wanted to check whether > its fixed online ( not via shell)? https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1781 I don't know if CentOS has CVE information...

...at 10:26 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku > <dvrao.584 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am using CentOS 5.5 with gcc version 2.5.123.el5. > > Are you really on 5.5? You should consider updating to 5.11. > > > I just wanted to check whether the CVE-2015-1781 is fixed in the current > > version? > > > > How can I do that? > > > > > > Right now I dont have access to that machine, so I wanted to check > whether > > its fixed online ( not via shell)? > > https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1781...

Hi, We are using CentOS 5.5 as a base OS for one of our products.The version of Glibc we are using was glibc-2.5-123.el5_11.1. We wanted to see whether this glibc is vulerable to CVE-2015-1781. I have gone through re-documentation & came across the following link https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2015-1781 In the link it is mentioned that, the CVE will not be fixed in Red-Hat 5 version. What does that mean? I mean, whether the RedHat 5 is vulnerable & fix is not availab...

...ded ? Now when starting with "asterisk -vvvc": Asterisk Dynamic Loader Starting: == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/modules.conf': Found [chan_capi.so] => (Common ISDN API for Asterisk) == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/capi.conf': Found NOTICE[16384]: File chan_capi.c, Line 1781 (mkif): ast_capi_pvt(50,50,remote,2,2) (1,2,64) == ast_capi_pvt(50,50,remote,2,2) (1,2,64) NOTICE[16384]: File chan_capi.c, Line 1781 (mkif): ast_capi_pvt(50,50,remote,2,2) (1,2,64) == ast_capi_pvt(50,50,remote,2,2) (1,2,64) NOTICE[16384]: File chan_capi.c, Line 1781 (mkif): ast_capi_pvt(57...

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku <dvrao.584 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > Where can we get the info regarding whether its fixed in CentOS 5 or not? > > I did rpm -q --changelog <glibc> | grep <CVE> > > but I dont find any info on this. > > This might means 3 things. > 1. The version is not affected so no fix

On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:51:58 +0530 Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > In the link it is mentioned that, the CVE will not be fixed in Red-Hat 5 > version. What does that mean? I mean, whether the RedHat 5 is vulnerable & > fix is not available or RedHat 5 is not vulnerable, hence the fix is not > given? Read what it says a little higher on that webpage, under the Statement heading:

The density of a lognormal should be 0 for negative arguments, but > dlnorm(-1) [1] NaN Warning message: NaNs produced in: dlnorm(x, meanlog, sdlog, log) A simple fix is to change dlnorm's definition to: function (x, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1, log = FALSE) .Internal(dlnorm(x*(x>0), meanlog, sdlog, log)) It might be faster to put the same sort of adjustment into the internal code, but

Many other security issues affect *unpatched* Centos 5.5 version. Some of very critical too .. -- Eero 2015-06-05 11:58 GMT+03:00 John Tall <mjtallx at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku > <dvrao.584 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > Where can we get the info regarding whether its fixed in CentOS 5 or

...failed: Invalid argument Jul 6 08:11:52 dovecot: imap(user at domain.tld): Error: read(/path/cencored/Maildir/cur/1201713258.3136.host.cencored.fi,S=1782:2,S) failed: Invalid argument (uid=5758) Jul 6 08:11:52 dovecot: imap(user at domain.tld): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (1781 < 1869) Jul 6 08:11:52 dovecot: imap(user at domain.tld): Error: Maildir filename has wrong S value, renamed the file from /path/cencored/Maildir/cur/1201767850.29173.host.cencored.fi,S=1781:2,S to /path/cencored/Maildir/cur/1201767850.29173.host.cencored.fi,S=1869:2,S Jul 6 08:11:52 doveco...

...639 IP 192.168.7.24.52315 > 192.168.7.252.22: . ack 2237 win 79 <nop,nop,timestamp 5130226 20400184> 18:55:15.171644 IP 192.168.7.24.52315 > 192.168.7.252.22: . ack 2301 win 79 <nop,nop,timestamp 5130226 20400184> 18:55:17.155112 IP 192.168.7.24.52315 > 192.168.7.252.22: P 1733:1781(48) ack 2301 win 79 <nop,nop,timestamp 5130722 20400184> 18:55:17.155432 IP 192.168.7.252.22 > 192.168.7.24.52315: P 2301:2349(48) ack 1781 win 90 <nop,nop,timestamp 20402168 5130722> 18:55:17.155471 IP 192.168.7.24.52315 > 192.168.7.252.22: . ack 2349 win 79 <nop,nop,timestamp...

...ared the message then Asterisk tries to call 439 on CallManager but with this error : -- Called 439@CallManager -- Got SIP response 482 "Loop Detected" back from CallManager -- Now forwarding SIP/CallManager-097b3dc0 to 'Local/439@default' (thanks to SIP/CallManager-1781) == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1) How can I overcome this ... Mohamed Farid ,,, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *...

...32 -rw------- 1 root root 1224 nov. 18 20:47 asterisk.crt -rw------- 1 root root 578 nov. 18 20:46 asterisk.csr -rw------- 1 root root 887 nov. 18 20:46 asterisk.key -rw------- 1 root root 2111 nov. 18 20:47 asterisk.pem -rw------- 1 root root 161 nov. 18 20:46 ca.cfg -rw------- 1 root root 1781 nov. 18 20:46 ca.crt -rw------- 1 root root 3311 nov. 18 20:46 ca.key -rw------- 1 root root 124 nov. 18 20:46 tmp.cfg # cat /etc/asterisk/http.conf [general] enabled=yes bindaddr=0.0.0.0 bindport=8088 tlsenable=yes tlsbindaddr=0.0.0.0:8089 tlscertfile=/etc/asterisk/keys/asterisk.pem But, sti...

...dministrator%password snippet: [2003/12/31 12:27:17, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1636) ldapsam_search_one_group: searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaGroupMapping)(sambaSID=S-1-5-21-406913949-92942006-6498272-512))] [2003/12/31 12:27:17, 4] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_getgroup(1781) ldapsam_getgroup: Did not find group [2003/12/31 12:27:18, 3] groupdb/mapping.c:smb_create_group(778) smb_create_group: Running the command `/opt/local/samba/sbin/smbldap-groupadd.pl -a "Domain Admins"' gave 0 [2003/12/31 12:27:18, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1...

Hi, I've noticed that the redirect sieve extension is placing an extra space before the headers of email when the 'redirect' command is used. Unfortunately this break gmail, yahoo, and most other email programs. I am using pigeonhole 0.4.0-14 with Dovecot 2.2.4.3; I see change 1781:e439789e3211 but it appears to only change how the X-Sieve header is generated. I only have the one dovecot instance but I will note that the setting 'mail_save_crlf = yes' is specified. Thanks, Anand

...criptEndPage (fp=0x726b2e78) at devPS.c:513 513 fprintf(fp, "ep\n"); (gdb) up #3 0x806d953 in PS_NewPage (dd=0x81df2d0) at devPS.c:1015 1015 if(pd->pageno > 1) PostScriptEndPage(pd->psfp); (gdb) up #4 0x8087c75 in Rf_GNewPlot (recording=1, ask=-2147483648) at graphics.c:1781 1781 dd->dp.newPage(dd); (gdb) up #5 0x80a33ab in do_plot_new (call=0x405ba44c, op=0x402e01b8, args=0x409418e0, env=0x40941944) at plot.c:370 370 dd = GNewPlot(call != R_NilValue, ask); (gdb) up #6 0x8095765 in do_internal (call=0x405ba4b0, op=0x402d8d00, args=0x405ba49c, en...

...le_event: Got event On hook(1) on channel 1 (index 0) Jun 2 18:14:06 DEBUG[1234379840]: chan_zap.c:1175 zt_disable_ec: disabled echo cancellation on channel 1 Jun 2 18:14:06 DEBUG[1234379840]: chan_zap.c:4525 ss_thread: waitfordigit returned < 0... Jun 2 18:14:06 DEBUG[1234379840]: chan_zap.c:1781 zt_hangup: Hangup: channel: 1 index = 0, normal = 23, callwait = -1, thirdcall = -1 Jun 2 18:14:06 DEBUG[1234379840]: chan_zap.c:1175 zt_disable_ec: disabled echo cancellation on channel 1 Jun 2 18:14:06 DEBUG[1234379840]: chan_zap.c:2172 zt_setoption: Set option TDD MODE, value: OFF(0) on Zap/1-...