Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "1750ms".
Did you mean:
150ms
2017 Dec 15
3
samba 4.7.3 DLZ performance regression
On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 18:52 -0600, Arthur Ramsey wrote:
> Thanks Andrew, much better than vanilla 4.7.3 but it is still performs
> much worse than vanilla 4.7.0 especially for DLZ zones.
I understand. The key issue is that to support the wildcards we
changed the way we use the database, the SCOPE_ONELEVEL index (compared
with SCOPE_BASE used exclusively in the past) over 7000 possible