search for: 1716048f

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "1716048f".

Did you mean: 1716045f
2005 Mar 11
0
[LLVMdev] FP Intrinsics
...eax,76E4F60h 17160472 mov dword ptr [esp+0Ch],eax 17160476 fld qword ptr [esp+14h] 1716047A fstp dword ptr [esp+8] 1716047E mov eax,15900060h 17160483 mov dword ptr [esp+4],eax 17160487 mov eax,161D6240h 1716048C mov dword ptr [esp],eax 1716048F call HueVMShaderCommands_LLVMShader1DLookupLinear (19D8B76h) 17160494 add esp,1Ch 17160497 ret 17160498 mov dword ptr ds:[161D6240h],0 171604A2 mov dword ptr ds:[161D6244h],0 171604AC mov dword ptr ds:[161D6248h],0 171604B6 mov dword ptr ds:[16...
2005 Mar 11
5
[LLVMdev] FP Intrinsics
Hello, I am trying to make the FP intrinsics (abs, sin, cos, sqrt) I've added work with the X86ISelPattern, but I'm having some difficulties understanding what needs to be done. I assume I have to add new nodetypes for the FP instructions to SelectionDAGNodes.h, and make nodes for these in SelectionDAGLowering::visitCall when I find the intrinsic... The part I don't quite
2005 Mar 17
1
[LLVMdev] Floating point compare instruction selection
...45F fld qword ptr [esp+14h] 17160463 fucomip st,st(1) 17160465 fstp st(0) 17160467 jbe 17160498 the ISelSimple generates: 1716047F call eax 17160481 fsub dword ptr ds:[16237240h] 17160487 fabs 17160489 fst qword ptr [esp+14h] 1716048D ftst 1716048F fstp st(0) 17160491 fnstsw ax 17160493 sahf 17160494 jbe 171604C7 m.
2005 Mar 16
0
[LLVMdev] Floating point compare instruction selection
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Hello, > > I didn't get any reply to my previous mail about adding floating point > intrinsics to the X86 pattern instruction selector... And I could really need > some help. Sorry about that, it slipped through the cracks. :( > Anyway, I think my confusion was caused partly by an already > existing bug in the instruction
2005 Mar 16
2
[LLVMdev] Floating point compare instruction selection
Hello, I didn't get any reply to my previous mail about adding floating point intrinsics to the X86 pattern instruction selector... And I could really need some help. Anyway, I think my confusion was caused partly by an already existing bug in the instruction selection for floating point compares. The case which emits code for the special case of comparing against constant 0.0 does not