search for: 16tib

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "16tib".

Did you mean: 16tb
2012 Aug 04
2
resize too large
I have a file system I am trying to resize via resize2fs but I get this error resize2fs 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) resize2fs: New size too large to be expressed in 32 bits im on debian squeeze 2.6.32-5-amd64 # pvs ? PV???????? VG????? Fmt? Attr PSize? PFree ? /dev/md1?? vgRAID6 lvm2 a-?? 18.17t 134.12g # lvs ? LV??? VG????? Attr?? LSize? Origin Snap%? Move Log Copy%? Convert ? data1 vgRAID6 -wi-ao
2007 Jul 25
1
File Size
Hello What is the largest file size that can be created on Linux ? is there any limitation ? Thanks
2006 Oct 03
1
16TB ext3 mainstream - when?
Are we likely to see patches to allow 16TB ext3 in the mainstream kernel any time soon? I am working with a storage box that has 16x750GB drives RAID5-ed together to create a potential 10.5TB of potential storage. But because ext3 is limited to 8TB I am forced to split into 2 smaller ext3 filesystems which is really cumbersome for my app. Any ideas anybody?
2006 Nov 26
1
ext3 4TB fs limit on amd64 (FAQ?)
Hi, I've a question about the max. ext3 FS size. The ext3 FAQ explains that the limit is 4TB. http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html | Ext3 can support files up to 1TB. With a 2.4 kernel the filesystem size is | limited by the maximal block device size, which is 2TB. In 2.6 the maximum | (32-bit CPU) limit is of block devices is 16TB, but ext3 supports only up | to 4TB.
2007 Feb 16
13
Problem with Share Size
Hi all, I have a problem with samba : I can create files, but can't create directories. The server has many shares, on seperated disks. We consider two of them : one 2Tb share and one share with more than 7Tb. Samba configuration is good, and works on many other servers, and on this one except for the large share. Permissions are correctly setted up too. I can read/write files and
2005 Sep 11
3
mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume
Hello, I have: CentOS4.1 x86_64 directly-attached Infortrend 9TB array QLogic HBA seen as sdb GPT label created in parted I want one single 9TB ext3 partition. I am experiencing crazy behavior from mke2fs / mkfs.ext3 (tried both). If I create partitions in parted up to approx 4,100,000 MB in parted, mkfs.ext3 works great. It lists the right number of blocks and creates a filesystem that fills
2013 Jun 10
35
Xen 4.3 development update
...gt;10 individuals) * NUMA scheduler affinity * Install into /usr/local by default * Allow config file to specify multiple usb devices for HVM domains * Persistent grants for blk (external) - Linux - qemu * Allow XSM to override IS_PRIV checks in the hypervisor * vTPM updates * Scalability: 16TiB of RAM * CPUID-based idle (don''t rely on ACPI info f/ dom0) * Serial console improvements -EHCI debug port == Bugs resolved since last update == * Revert Jan''s debugging patch (commit bd9be94) resolution: reverted * Migration w/ qemu-upstream causes stuck clock resoluto...