Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "16mbit".
Did you mean:
16bit
2007 Oct 16
0
Determining burst/cburst HTB values
...part-2 [1:30] part-3 [1:40]
My script (without filter statements) follows:
[root@mercury ~]# cat tc.sh
#!/bin/bash
# reset
tc qdisc del dev eth0 root
# root qdisc
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10
# root class
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 16mbit
# default partition
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1mbit ceil 16mbit
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
# partition-1
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1mbit ceil 1mbit
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:20 handle 20: sfq perturb 10...
2005 Jul 14
5
Use of qcdisc+htb
Hi folks.
This message may be a bit verbose and not as techie as the ones I''ve
seen in this list, but describing the scenario will save a lot of
messages.
Scenario:
A building with 17 floors, each floor with 24 offices (totals 408
offices) connected to the backbone through a border switch (1 vlan for
each office). The offices can lease bandwidth of 64k, 128k, 256k,
512k, 1M and 2Mbps,
2004 Jan 21
1
HTB and VOIP- Choppy voice quality: What am I doing wrong? Desperate!
...up as follows:
( 1: )
(1:1) (1:2)
(1:10) (1:11)(1:12)
Here is my script, it is the same at all 3 sites http://208.45.203.97/script.txt (I would post it, but it is pretty long). As you can see I have given 80mbit to the phones (remember, they should only need 252k!), 16mbit to default, and cut windows file sharing back to 1mbit, but I still have voice issues during file transfers! I know the filters are catching the traffic (I did "tc -s -d class show dev eth1" and watched my numbers while calling, and transferring files, and the incremented properly) Can an...
2005 Jun 25
0
Performance of Route Hat
.... Admitedly, they are not very thorough, but I can do that as well when
I have more time.
Site specs:
- LAN consisting of 5 dormitories totalling ~1400 computers (max measured
concurrent users ~750, at the time the measurements were done there were
slightly over 500 concurrent users)
- 6 subnets
- 16MBit internet (16 up, 16 down)
Router HW specs:
- Athlon XP, 2GHz
- 512MB RAM
- 40GB HDD (only ~100MB used, mostly for logs)
- 2* 3Com PCI 3c905C Tornado
(you see, nothing special)
Router SW specs:
- Route Hat 0.3.193 (built 2. may 2005)
- all functions active except DHCP-Server (customer has its own)...
2005 Feb 13
0
Shaping question - tunnel
...I''m trying to
find the simplest solution possible as to also be easier to manage.
1)
I have:
ISP1 ------ S1 (linux)
S1''s got:
512kbits external bandwidth from ISP1
20Mbits MAN bandwidth not including ISP2
17Mbit tunnel connection which provider : 1 Mbit external bandwidth
and 16Mbit MAN bandwidth with ISP2
HTB and IMQ are placed on S1.
2)
I want to be able to guarantee a piece of bandwith for each user (like
128kbits MAN without ISP2 + 128kbits external bandwidth from tunnel +
1 Mbit MAN bandwidth with ISP2 from tunnel) and for other users
(128kbits MAN without ISP2 + 1 Mbi...
2004 Apr 05
0
htb v3 question - quantum and r2q again
...tc3 from Devik''s site, RH9.
My data flow is about 100Mbit duplex and is subject to grow, so
I''m creating root class with 200Mbit rate, with r2q=10,
quantum = rate/r2q, and 1500 < quantum < 200000 (sch_htb.c)
with such r2q my default shaping window will be from 120Kbit to 16Mbit, right?
So, the question is choosing r2q=10 -> max bandwith for root class=16M,
or it affects only leafs?
--
Michael Vasilenko
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2004 Nov 22
0
Testing if tc works as configured and shaping rtp traffic
...add dev eth1"
IPT_CMD="iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth1"
$TCQDSK_CMD root handle 1: htb default 12
$TCCLAS_CMD parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 20mbit ceil 20mbit
$TCCLAS_CMD parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 2mbit ceil 2mbit prio 1
$TCCLAS_CMD parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 16mbit ceil 20mbit prio 2
$TCCLAS_CMD parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 2mbit ceil 2mbit prio 3
$TCQDSK_CMD parent 1:10 handle 31: pfifo limit 5
$TCQDSK_CMD parent 1:11 handle 35: pfifo limit 5
$TCQDSK_CMD parent 1:12 handle 39: sfq perturb 10
#Hi prio
$IPT_CMD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST,ACK SYN -j CLASSI...
2006 Mar 30
5
packet marking: only a ratio, not all
Hi all!
In short:
Anybody wrote a patch for DSMARK to make it capable of marking
only a ratio (a given arg to the tc command) of the packets it gets?
Say, 20%? Or, do I have to hack into the source? Alternatives,
like a filter spitting packets to 2 different DSMARK based on this ratio?
In long:
I''m a hungarian univ student involved in a project (RMD-QoS stuff)
which needs
2010 May 27
32
pfSense HVM
Hi Everyone,
Does anybody have any experience using pfSense on Xen? I would most
probably have to use HVM...
My idea would be to use PCI-Passthrough to the pfsense DomU, and only
make the Dom0 accessable via the pfsense firewall
Thanks
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2005 Jun 28
0
Re: Questin regarding HTB
...ownload
$TC filter add dev eth1 parent 1: prio 2 protocol ip handle 3 fw flowid
1:203 #download
#---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:200 classid 1:203 htb rate 10Mbit ceil
16Mbit prio 2 #upload
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:203 handle 203: sfq perturb 6
#upload
$I -t mangle -A FORWARD -o eth0 -s 194.126.178.3 -j MARK --set-mark 603
#upload
$TC filter add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 2 protocol ip handle 603 fw flowid
1:203
on this one i can give wha...
2004 Jul 08
9
Is Linux based Router feasible
Hi,
I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux
machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different
ISPs. My question is can a Linux based machine match the performance of
a hardware based routers provided by Cisco,... OR is my decision to go
for a Linux based solution is a wrong one?.
Is there so much difference between these