search for: 16e3f860

On 1/14/2013 4:57 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > I absolutely think that when a function has an optimization attribute, > that applies to the code in the function and all code inlined into the > function. If foo calls bar then foo's optimization level should be valid > for bar, or bar should be marked noinline, or something else. That's going way too far. For example, if

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 1/14/2013 3:23 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> >> This is a great question. My plan would be: inlining doesn't impact the >> attributes. The inliner will be free to look at both the caller and the >> callee's attributes to choose the best inlining decision.

...this is more of a theoretical invariant. If we discover such a situation is is likely either invalid code or invalid optimizations, not an invalid model. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130118/16e3f860/attachment.html>