search for: 16cb

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "16cb".

Did you mean: 16b
2020 Nov 17
7
changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
...hope someone here is able to explain..? > > It's output: > >> root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness >> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc >> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 >> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 >> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69 >> Unknown invocation ID e50c4440-f3d2-429e-a19d-c11bc72f5565 >> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc >> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 >...
2020 Nov 17
0
changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
...nvocation ID" means. I hope someone here is able to explain..? It's output: > root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs uptodateness > Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 > Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69 > Unknown invocation ID e50c4440-f3d2-429e-a19d-c11bc72f5565 > Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > Unknown invocat...
2020 Nov 17
0
changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
Same as MJ and You. So you have 5 DC's running. > >>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > >>> Unknown invocation ID 7281ff0f-5af2-4ded-bdaf-362f1545d221 > >>> Unknown invocation ID 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 > >>> Unknown invocation ID b97cc603-6d03-4ad0-8629-be408fed8d69 > >>> Unknown invocation ID e50c4440-f3d2-429e-a19d-c11bc72f5565 > >>> Unknown invocation ID 556b2cb4-e576-48e2-bb7c-7f62caee84fc > >>> Unknown invocation ID 7281...
2020 Nov 16
6
changes on DC not replicated, while showrepl reports no issues
Hi all, We are running a three DC samba AD, using 4.12.8 sernet packages. Very stable for years. Today at 12:30 my colleague moved two users from * CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com to * OU=disabled,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com This change was done on the DC4 at 12:30 using LAM (ldap-account-manager version 7.3) Ever since that, my automated samba-tool ldapcmp scripts started reporting
2014 Jul 01
1
sudden replication failures
Hi all, Samba (sernet) 4.1.7, and we're getting high cpu usage on dc1, and on dc2 (my 'secondary' dc): root at dc2:~# samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\DC2 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: 5e93a102-2963-496a-af16-0c51eebb2e31 DSA invocationId: 82b24c02-16cb-4ed1-b68b-a047c26886a9 ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=samba,DC=domain,DC=com Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 via RPC DSA object GUID: 81a27497-bdfb-4977-9874-675bbfba490f Last attempt @ Tue Jul 1 20:58:53 2014 CEST failed, result 8442 (WERR_DS_DRA_INTERNAL_ERROR) 825 consec...