search for: 167k

...t; If you have the ability to rebuild Syslinux from source, perhaps you > could try the following patch? Yes. I done the rebuild, but I can not test just now (enconding video!). I will post the result in ~10 hours ;) If anyone that can reproduce the issue want to test, here is the compressed (~167K) ISO image (~129M)[#2]. This is just and ISO image with isolinux.bin (at LBA 65536) patched + "coco" (a file filled with \0), so if works propertly, you can see message about missing ldlinux.c32. Thanks for your time! [#1] http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2013-November/021187.html [#2...

...28 2011-05-13 08:30 iamchert -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 14 2011-05-13 03:28 position.baseA -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 718K 2011-05-13 08:30 position.baseB -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 359G 2011-05-13 08:30 position.DB -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 14 2011-05-12 17:22 postlist.baseA -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 167K 2011-05-13 02:26 postlist.baseB -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 84G 2011-05-13 02:26 postlist.DB -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 14 2011-05-13 02:26 record.baseA -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 301K 2011-05-13 03:02 record.baseB -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 151G 2011-05-13 03:02 record.DB -rw-r--r-- 1 kevin kevin 14 2...

...LBA 65536 (~128M) and 655360 (~1280M) and works fine in both cases. The big mistery is why this works in some machines and why fails in others. (maybe garbage in high word of "edx"?) Thanks. > > If anyone that can reproduce the issue want to test, here is the > compressed (~167K) ISO image (~129M)[#2]. > This is just and ISO image with isolinux.bin (at LBA 65536) patched + > "coco" (a file filled with \0), so if works propertly, you can see > message about missing ldlinux.c32. > > > Thanks for your time! > > > [#1] http://www.syslin...

On 11/25/2013 04:12 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > > I made some more and more experiments beyond LBA 65535 > > Works: * isolinux-4.07.bin (size 24574) * isolinux-5.00.bin (size > 34816) > > Does not work: * isolinux-5.01.bin (size 34816) * isolinux-5.10.bin > (size 36864) * isolinux-6.00.bin (size 38912) * isolinux-6.02.bin > (size 43008) > > * I just

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.

I am setting to a shorewall system with 4 NIC''s as per the outline specification below. Can anyone please have a look and let me know what I have missed and what I have got wrong as I want to take this system live ASAP but do not want to kill internet access and the hosting for too long ! I have listed below the system outline & have attached the config files that I have changed, if

Hi, I have a install of shorewall I have 2 interfaces(I think) ppp0[connection device] and eth0 [LAN device], I want to allow all traffic from the the internet in or aleast port 80 and CVS and webmin and mail and everything normal to the main machine with shorewall on it. I changed to policy file but it just gave me errors as to double interfaces. I also what still to alow connection sharing