search for: 167936

...) nouveau 0000:01:00.0: unknown chipset (136000a1) nouveau: probe of 0000:01:00.0 failed with error -12 If I do an lsmod | nouveau i get: 101:nouveau 1691648 0 103:mxm_wmi 16384 1 nouveau 104:i2c_algo_bit 16384 2 i915,nouveau 107:drm_kms_helper 167936 2 i915,nouveau 111:ttm 110592 1 nouveau 117:drm 397312 6 ttm,i915,drm_kms_helper,nouveau 118:wmi 16384 3 dell_wmi,mxm_wmi,nouveau 119:video 45056 3 i915,dell_wmi,nouveau 120:button 16384 2 i915,nouveau Th...

...te: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm using virt-manager on my F23 box to run a Windows 10 image but the >> performance is so bad it's killing me. >> >> I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo >> >> # lsmod |grep kvm >> kvm_intel 167936 6 >> kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel >> >> virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch >> >> But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? >> > > Not on the host AFAIK. > > The disk format used is vmdk with no caching and native mode. >&...

Hello, I'm using virt-manager on my F23 box to run a Windows 10 image but the performance is so bad it's killing me. I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo # lsmod |grep kvm kvm_intel 167936 6 kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? The disk format used is vmdk with no caching and native mode. The io is 100% in windows task manager performing less than 1MB/s Any clues? /usr/bin/qemu-sys...

...dows 10 image but the >>>>>> performance is so bad it's killing me. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo >>>>>> >>>>>> # lsmod |grep kvm >>>>>> kvm_intel 167936 6 >>>>>> kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel >>>>>> >>>>>> virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch >>>>>> >>>>>> But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? >>>>>> >>>&g...

...;m using virt-manager on my F23 box to run a Windows 10 image but the >>>> performance is so bad it's killing me. >>>> >>>> I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo >>>> >>>> # lsmod |grep kvm >>>> kvm_intel 167936 6 >>>> kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel >>>> >>>> virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch >>>> >>>> But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? >>>> >>>> >>> Not on the host AFAIK. >>&...

...6428 7464 7851 8673 10627 10416 9707 8357 8678 8745 "Campos_del_Río" 1517 1690 1743 1942 1971 2274 2222 2021 2046 1949 "Caravaca_de_la_Cruz" 15804 17520 18854 21560 20550 21752 20943 18782 20455 21296 "Cartagena" 103373 102519 101613 102705 115468 110979 122387 143466 167936 168023 "Cehegín" 11523 13411 13801 15258 17684 15833 16109 12722 13648 13614 "Ceutí" 2303 2642 2891 3504 4127 3933 4649 5396 5664 6411 "Cieza" 13590 14337 16026 17667 23866 23433 22619 26089 30327 30875 "Fortuna" 6552 6770 6306 6681 6248 5964 5707 5612 5792 6...

...;> >>> I'm using virt-manager on my F23 box to run a Windows 10 image but the >>> performance is so bad it's killing me. >>> >>> I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo >>> >>> # lsmod |grep kvm >>> kvm_intel 167936 6 >>> kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel >>> >>> virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch >>> >>> But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? >>> >> >> Not on the host AFAIK. >> >> The disk format used is vmd...

...t a debian maschine, both applications are running fine. But when I try to start liveice in a 'screen' environment then the liveice process ends without an error message: $ /usr/bin/screen -dmS liveice /usr/bin/liveice A prefixed 'strace -f' shows me: [pid 5614] old_mmap(NULL, 167936, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40187000 [pid 5614] write(2, "LAME version 3.92 (http://www.m"..., 45) = 45 [pid 5614] write(2, "usage: /usr/bin/lame [options] <"..., 542) = 542 [pid 5614] _exit(1) Why ist 'lame' started with wrong (...

I have installed wine on Ubuntu 7.10 from the Ubuntu repository. I have a Photoshop Elements install cdrom and get the following when I try to install paul at hppaul:/cdrom/adobe photoshop elements$ wine setup.exe wine: could not load L"D:\\adobe photoshop elements\\setup.exe": Module not found paul at hppaul:/cdrom/adobe photoshop elements$ ls adobe photoshop elements 4.msi digital

...t;>>>>>> performance is so bad it's killing me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # lsmod |grep kvm >>>>>>> kvm_intel 167936 6 >>>>>>> kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? >>>>&gt...

...t a debian maschine, both applications are running fine. But when I try to start liveice in a 'screen' environment then the liveice process ends without an error message: $ /usr/bin/screen -dmS liveice /usr/bin/liveice A prefixed 'strace -f' shows me: [pid 5614] old_mmap(NULL, 167936, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40187000 [pid 5614] write(2, "LAME version 3.92 (http://www.m"..., 45) = 45 [pid 5614] write(2, "usage: /usr/bin/lame [options] <"..., 542) = 542 [pid 5614] _exit(1) Why is 'lame' started with wrong (i...

..., 2016 at 08:49:38AM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote: >Hello, > >I'm using virt-manager on my F23 box to run a Windows 10 image but the >performance is so bad it's killing me. > >I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo > ># lsmod |grep kvm >kvm_intel 167936 6 >kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel > >virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch > >But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? Not on the host AFAIK. >The disk format used is vmdk with no caching and native mode. >The io is 100% in windows task manager performi...

...53248 23 0 hv_fcopy_daemon [762303.508519] [ 431] 106 431 11281 42 139264 82 -900 dbus-daemon [762303.508521] [ 501] 0 501 221424 6 1060864 5516 0 samba [762303.508522] [ 510] 107 510 16674 224 167936 912 0 snmpd [762303.508524] [ 518] 0 518 3632 0 73728 37 0 agetty [762303.508526] [ 773] 0 773 17489 3 180224 189 -1000 sshd [762303.508527] [ 784] 0 784 39887 0 274432 418...

...my F23 box to run a Windows 10 image but the >>>>> performance is so bad it's killing me. >>>>> >>>>> I have "vmx" flag in /proc/cpuinfo >>>>> >>>>> # lsmod |grep kvm >>>>> kvm_intel 167936 6 >>>>> kvm 503808 1 kvm_intel >>>>> >>>>> virtio-win-0.1.112-1.noarch >>>>> >>>>> But no virtio modules loaded. Should they be loaded nowadays? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>...

...drwx------ 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 Cookies d--------- 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 Desktop d--------- 4 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 Favorites d--------- 3 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 My Documents -rwx------ 1 renloe users 167936 Feb 27 14:25 NTUSER.DAT drwx------ 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 NetHood drwx------ 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 PrintHood drwx------ 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 Recent drwx------ 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 SendTo d--------- 3 ren...

...v_fcopy_daemon > [762303.508519] [ 431] 106 431 11281 42 > 139264 82 -900 dbus-daemon > [762303.508521] [ 501] 0 501 221424 6 > 1060864 5516 0 samba > [762303.508522] [ 510] 107 510 16674 224 > 167936 912 0 snmpd > [762303.508524] [ 518] 0 518 3632 0 > 73728 37 0 agetty > [762303.508526] [ 773] 0 773 17489 3 > 180224 189 -1000 sshd > [762303.508527] [ 784] 0 784 39887 0...

...rc.adf): pos = 831488, size = 512, returned 512 read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arc.adf): pos = 832000, size = 512, returned 512 [...] I did the same with the Samba 2.2.8a server and here the picture is quite different: [...] read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arc.adf): pos = 167936, size = 4096, returned 4096 read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arc.adf): pos = 172032, size = 4096, returned 4096 read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arx.adf): pos = 28672, size = 4096, returned 4096 read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arc.adf): pos = 176128, size = 4096, r...

I''ve been testing ZFS since it came out on b27 and this week I BFUed to b30. I''ve seen two problems, one I''ll call minor and the other major. The hardware is a Dell PowerEdge 2600 with 2 3.2GHz Xeons, 2GB memory and a perc3 controller. I have created a filesystem for over 1000 users on it and take hourly snapshots, which destroy the one from 24 hours ago, except the

...kies > > > d--------- 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 Desktop > > > d--------- 4 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 Favorites > > > d--------- 3 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 My Documents > > > -rwx------ 1 renloe users 167936 Feb 27 14:25 NTUSER.DAT > > > drwx------ 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 NetHood > > > drwx------ 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 PrintHood > > > drwx------ 2 renloe users 4096 Feb 27 14:23 Recent > > > drwx------ 2 renloe...